Assessment design through co-creation

This case study reports on a co-creation initiative that explored the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the context of higher education assessments. The AI Co-Creators project aimed to promote dialogue between students and staff on the impact of AI with the objective of using AI tools more effectively. The case study presents a collaborative partnership which focused on evaluating ChatGPT-generated output in response to diverse coursework assessments on an undergraduate medical sciences programme. The co-design of evaluation criteria and key findings are presented and resultant challenges faced by students and staff are explored through dialogue, interview, and thematic analysis. The value of the student-staff collaboration is explored from the perspective of the student, staff, and institution, while the benefits, limitations and recommendations for future co-creation projects are presented in the context of AI and higher education assessment and learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Students as Partners
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5802
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reflective Practices in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment design through co-creation

Andrew E. Williams, Ellie Ingle
1 citations
International Journal for Students as Partners
Reflective Practices in Education
8.93
article

Assessment design through co-creation

Andrew E. Williams, Ellie Ingle
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This case study reports on a co-creation initiative that explored the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the context of higher education assessments. The AI Co-Creators project aimed to promote dialogue between students and staff on the impact of AI with the objective of using AI tools more effectively. The case study presents a collaborative partnership which focused on evaluating ChatGPT-generated output in response to diverse coursework assessments on an undergraduate medical sciences programme. The co-design of evaluation criteria and key findings are presented and resultant challenges faced by students and staff are explored through dialogue, interview, and thematic analysis. The value of the student-staff collaboration is explored from the perspective of the student, staff, and institution, while the benefits, limitations and recommendations for future co-creation projects are presented in the context of AI and higher education assessment and learning.

International Journal for Students as PartnersVol. 9(1)
University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Reflective Practices in Education
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.