Analysis of Screw/Pedicle-Width Ratio and Accuracy in Navigated Versus 3D-Controlled Fluoroscopy-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesDue to the close anatomic relationship between the pedicle and neurovascular structures, avoiding pedicle perforations is crucial in pedicle screw placement. Still, the use of larger screws has biomechanical advantages. Intraoperative 2D and 3D imaging, and navigation guidance can be used to combine both goals. The aim of this study was to compare the screw diameter/pedicle width ratio (SPR) and the screw placement accuracy for 3D controlled fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement vs computer navigated transpedicular screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine.Methods200 cases of thoracic and lumbar pedicle screw placement, of which 100 cases were performed using intraoperative computer navigation and 100 cases were performed using fluoroscopy-guidance were retrospectively registered. In the fluoroscopy group, intraoperative 3D scans were performed to confirm implant position and allow for potential intraoperative revision. In addition to accuracy and SPR, demographics, dose reports, and procedure times were analyzed.ResultsOverall, 716 fluoroscopy-guided screws were compared with 740 screws placed using navigation. Screw accuracy (83.2% vs 90.5%; <i>P</i> = .001) and SPR (0.85 ± 0.17 vs 0.88 ± 0.21; <i>P</i> < .001) were significantly higher using navigation compared to fluoroscopic guidance. Furthermore, dose area product (28,545 ± 17,693 vs 20,638 ± 15,856 mGycm<sup>2</sup>; <i>P</i> < .001), fluoroscopy time (223.6 ± 93.6 vs 92.3 ± 39.7 seconds; <i>P</i> < .001), and procedure time (154.0 ± 81.0 vs 119.7 ± 48.7 min; <i>P</i> = .004) were significantly lower using navigation.ConclusionsIntraoperative navigation does not only increase the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, but also allows for the placement of larger screws relative to the pedicle width, which may have biomechanical advantages. Notably, contrary to other studies, the use of navigation did not increase patient radiation exposure or procedure time compared to fluoroscopic guidance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Spine Journal
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251343523
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Screw/Pedicle-Width Ratio and Accuracy in Navigated Versus 3D-Controlled Fluoroscopy-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement

Paul Alfred Gruetzner, Jan Stallkamp, Eric Mandelka, Sven Yves Vetter et al.
1 citations
Global Spine Journal
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
2.01
article

Analysis of Screw/Pedicle-Width Ratio and Accuracy in Navigated Versus 3D-Controlled Fluoroscopy-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement

Paul Alfred Gruetzner, Jan Stallkamp, Eric Mandelka, Sven Yves Vetter, Jula Gierse, Felix Zimmermann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesDue to the close anatomic relationship between the pedicle and neurovascular structures, avoiding pedicle perforations is crucial in pedicle screw placement. Still, the use of larger screws has biomechanical advantages. Intraoperative 2D and 3D imaging, and navigation guidance can be used to combine both goals. The aim of this study was to compare the screw diameter/pedicle width ratio (SPR) and the screw placement accuracy for 3D controlled fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement vs computer navigated transpedicular screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine.Methods200 cases of thoracic and lumbar pedicle screw placement, of which 100 cases were performed using intraoperative computer navigation and 100 cases were performed using fluoroscopy-guidance were retrospectively registered. In the fluoroscopy group, intraoperative 3D scans were performed to confirm implant position and allow for potential intraoperative revision. In addition to accuracy and SPR, demographics, dose reports, and procedure times were analyzed.ResultsOverall, 716 fluoroscopy-guided screws were compared with 740 screws placed using navigation. Screw accuracy (83.2% vs 90.5%; <i>P</i> = .001) and SPR (0.85 ± 0.17 vs 0.88 ± 0.21; <i>P</i> < .001) were significantly higher using navigation compared to fluoroscopic guidance. Furthermore, dose area product (28,545 ± 17,693 vs 20,638 ± 15,856 mGycm<sup>2</sup>; <i>P</i> < .001), fluoroscopy time (223.6 ± 93.6 vs 92.3 ± 39.7 seconds; <i>P</i> < .001), and procedure time (154.0 ± 81.0 vs 119.7 ± 48.7 min; <i>P</i> = .004) were significantly lower using navigation.ConclusionsIntraoperative navigation does not only increase the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, but also allows for the placement of larger screws relative to the pedicle width, which may have biomechanical advantages. Notably, contrary to other studies, the use of navigation did not increase patient radiation exposure or procedure time compared to fluoroscopic guidance.

Global Spine JournalVol. 16(1)
University of Mannheim (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Ludwigshafen (DE), Klinikum Ludwigshafen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.