Research Capability and Productivity: Basis for Responsive Research Development Plan

This study aimed to determine the research capability and productivity of the faculty as the basis for a responsive research development plan. A descriptive-correlation method of research was adopted using the Pearson Product Moment Correlation in determining the relationship between faculty’s research capability and research productivity. The data were gathered through validated semi-structured survey instruments and unstructured interviews. Frequency distribution, percentage technique, weighted mean, and Pearson Correlation Coefficient were used in the interpretation of data. Faculty respondents’ mean productivity was higher on publication (4.05) as author (3.27), with journals as publication outlets (2.69), and indexed in journals (2.07). They are moderately capable in terms of conceptual skills (4.31); computational skills (3.29) and technical skills (2.89). A significant relationship exists between research capability and productivity in conceptual (.039) and technical skills (.012) Findings also revealed that the research capability of the faculty that showed significant relationship with research productivity was along conceptual skills (r=.693; p=0.039) and technical skills (r=.786; p=.012) at a 5% level of significance. A Responsive Research Development Plan” was designed for faculty members to enhance their research capabilities, focusing on developing research skills and integrating technology in research and publication. It is recommended that a research capability training program be designed to enhance teachers’ skills in writing publishable research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.90400409
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research Capability and Productivity: Basis for Responsive Research Development Plan

A. F. Castillo, Roanne Rosyl B. Salvan, Sylvia B. Salvan
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

Research Capability and Productivity: Basis for Responsive Research Development Plan

A. F. Castillo, Roanne Rosyl B. Salvan, Sylvia B. Salvan
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the research capability and productivity of the faculty as the basis for a responsive research development plan. A descriptive-correlation method of research was adopted using the Pearson Product Moment Correlation in determining the relationship between faculty’s research capability and research productivity. The data were gathered through validated semi-structured survey instruments and unstructured interviews. Frequency distribution, percentage technique, weighted mean, and Pearson Correlation Coefficient were used in the interpretation of data. Faculty respondents’ mean productivity was higher on publication (4.05) as author (3.27), with journals as publication outlets (2.69), and indexed in journals (2.07). They are moderately capable in terms of conceptual skills (4.31); computational skills (3.29) and technical skills (2.89). A significant relationship exists between research capability and productivity in conceptual (.039) and technical skills (.012) Findings also revealed that the research capability of the faculty that showed significant relationship with research productivity was along conceptual skills (r=.693; p=0.039) and technical skills (r=.786; p=.012) at a 5% level of significance. A Responsive Research Development Plan” was designed for faculty members to enhance their research capabilities, focusing on developing research skills and integrating technology in research and publication. It is recommended that a research capability training program be designed to enhance teachers’ skills in writing publishable research.

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social ScienceVol. IX(IV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.