An unsettled theory of mind

Theory of Mind (ToM) research often takes for granted that minds have certain basic features: that they reside primarily in brains, that cognition and sensation are functionally and architecturally distinct, and that sophisticated ToM is uniquely human. This contribution examines an alternative ToM preserved in the archival testimonies of nineteenth-century |Xam hunter-gatherers in southern Africa, demonstrating how distinct ontologies yield fundamentally different understandings of cognition, consciousness, and their distributions in the world. Grounded in detailed anatomical knowledge and systematic environmental awareness, |Xam neuroanatomical theory locates mental processes in the throat, arteries and spine rather than the brain, understands thought to be rooted in observable physiological processes within the self and the other, and recognises consciousness across species boundaries. The studied archive reveals distinctly phenomenological accounts of cognition, identifying thought through perception of certain movements: in the internal movements of one’s own body and in external movements of social others, human or otherwise, demonstrating their own awareness of being observed. The |Xam criteria for conscious agency in the world thus functions as commentaries on their own experiences of mind, resonating with contemporary questions about embodied cognition and awareness, and the distribution of consciousness in the body beyond the brain, and in the world beyond the human.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hunter Gatherer Research
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/hgr.2025.4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An unsettled theory of mind

Andrew S. Skinner
1 citations
Hunter Gatherer Research
Cultural Differences and Values
2.44
article

An unsettled theory of mind

Andrew S. Skinner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Theory of Mind (ToM) research often takes for granted that minds have certain basic features: that they reside primarily in brains, that cognition and sensation are functionally and architecturally distinct, and that sophisticated ToM is uniquely human. This contribution examines an alternative ToM preserved in the archival testimonies of nineteenth-century |Xam hunter-gatherers in southern Africa, demonstrating how distinct ontologies yield fundamentally different understandings of cognition, consciousness, and their distributions in the world. Grounded in detailed anatomical knowledge and systematic environmental awareness, |Xam neuroanatomical theory locates mental processes in the throat, arteries and spine rather than the brain, understands thought to be rooted in observable physiological processes within the self and the other, and recognises consciousness across species boundaries. The studied archive reveals distinctly phenomenological accounts of cognition, identifying thought through perception of certain movements: in the internal movements of one’s own body and in external movements of social others, human or otherwise, demonstrating their own awareness of being observed. The |Xam criteria for conscious agency in the world thus functions as commentaries on their own experiences of mind, resonating with contemporary questions about embodied cognition and awareness, and the distribution of consciousness in the body beyond the brain, and in the world beyond the human.

Hunter Gatherer Research
University of South Africa (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cultural Differences and Values
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.