African migrants’ perception and attitude towards COVID-19 pandemic and its public health response in New South Wales, Australia: a qualitative study

The success of a public health response to an infectious disease outbreak depends on the public perception and attitude towards its risks and the significance of preventive approaches. Understanding public perceptions and attitudes is critical, especially for the migrant population. Our study explored African migrants’ perceptions and attitudes towards the COVID-19 pandemic and its public health response in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. We employed an inductive, qualitative research design. We conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 21 African migrants across New South Wales. We analysed our data thematically. Our findings suggest that African migrants were sceptical about the severity of COVID-19 and Australia’s public health response. Such scepticism was enhanced by conspiracy theories, mixed messaging, poor community engagement, and perceived racial and cultural hyper-policing of African migrants during the pandemic, which affected the uptake of the COVID-19 response intervention. Vaccine hesitancy was also seen to be underpinned by apprehensions about efficacy and safety, and the need for boosters. Such concerns were deepened by mistrust of government authorities and initiatives. African migrants in NSW interpreted COVID-19 and its response through an Afrocentric lens. Misinformation and distrust hindered vaccine uptake, highlighting the importance of community engagement in public health initiatives to build trust and counter misinformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Public Health
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-025-00664-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

African migrants’ perception and attitude towards COVID-19 pandemic and its public health response in New South Wales, Australia: a qualitative study

Jon Wardle, Peter James, Kathomi Gatwiri
1 citations
Discover Public Health
Migration, Health and Trauma
2.31
article

African migrants’ perception and attitude towards COVID-19 pandemic and its public health response in New South Wales, Australia: a qualitative study

Jon Wardle, Peter James, Kathomi Gatwiri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The success of a public health response to an infectious disease outbreak depends on the public perception and attitude towards its risks and the significance of preventive approaches. Understanding public perceptions and attitudes is critical, especially for the migrant population. Our study explored African migrants’ perceptions and attitudes towards the COVID-19 pandemic and its public health response in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. We employed an inductive, qualitative research design. We conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 21 African migrants across New South Wales. We analysed our data thematically. Our findings suggest that African migrants were sceptical about the severity of COVID-19 and Australia’s public health response. Such scepticism was enhanced by conspiracy theories, mixed messaging, poor community engagement, and perceived racial and cultural hyper-policing of African migrants during the pandemic, which affected the uptake of the COVID-19 response intervention. Vaccine hesitancy was also seen to be underpinned by apprehensions about efficacy and safety, and the need for boosters. Such concerns were deepened by mistrust of government authorities and initiatives. African migrants in NSW interpreted COVID-19 and its response through an Afrocentric lens. Misinformation and distrust hindered vaccine uptake, highlighting the importance of community engagement in public health initiatives to build trust and counter misinformation.

Discover Public HealthVol. 22(1)
University of Sierra Leone (SL), Southern Cross University (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Migration, Health and Trauma
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.