More than meets the eye: Feature concerns and suggestions in mobile XR app reviews

This study aims to address quality concerns in mobile Extended Reality (XR) apps by developing tools to classify user reviews from the Google Play Store. Our first major contribution is a holistic approach to coding thousands of reviews, offering a unified framework to assess feature concerns and feature suggestions, thereby enhancing the understanding of user expectations. We also introduce a novel toolset for extracting key terms related to these concerns and suggestions, facilitating rapid analysis and improvement of app functionalities. To validate our approach, we compare the performance of this automated coding method with sentiment analysis, deep learning-based BERT, and several large language models (LLMs). Additionally, our study extends the understanding of user satisfaction by analyzing quantitative indicators such as app ratings and review helpfulness, offering new perspectives on user perceptions of XR app quality. This research has discovered vital areas for feature improvement without implementing complex infrastructure and using advanced technical expertise, enabling app firms to better target their efforts in improving XR app experiences. • Developed a novel framework for classifying user reviews of mobile XR apps to identify feature concerns and suggestions. • Compared explainable smoke term-scoring techniques with deep learning-based BERT classification to enhance feedback analysis. • Conducted an exploratory qualitative analysis comparing XR and non-XR app feedback, revealing distinct user concerns around immersion, safety, and device limitations. • Found XR users are more likely to suggest updates to existing features and propose new safety features, highlighting the unique demands of immersive technologies. • Demonstrated how automated feedback tools can improve XR app development by streamlining issue detection and guiding feature refinement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Decision Support Systems
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2025.114475
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mobile and Web Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More than meets the eye: Feature concerns and suggestions in mobile XR app reviews

David M. Goldberg, Zhilei Qiao, Alan S. Abrahams, Nohel Zaman
1 citations
Decision Support Systems
Mobile and Web Applications
3.25
article

More than meets the eye: Feature concerns and suggestions in mobile XR app reviews

David M. Goldberg, Zhilei Qiao, Alan S. Abrahams, Nohel Zaman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aims to address quality concerns in mobile Extended Reality (XR) apps by developing tools to classify user reviews from the Google Play Store. Our first major contribution is a holistic approach to coding thousands of reviews, offering a unified framework to assess feature concerns and feature suggestions, thereby enhancing the understanding of user expectations. We also introduce a novel toolset for extracting key terms related to these concerns and suggestions, facilitating rapid analysis and improvement of app functionalities. To validate our approach, we compare the performance of this automated coding method with sentiment analysis, deep learning-based BERT, and several large language models (LLMs). Additionally, our study extends the understanding of user satisfaction by analyzing quantitative indicators such as app ratings and review helpfulness, offering new perspectives on user perceptions of XR app quality. This research has discovered vital areas for feature improvement without implementing complex infrastructure and using advanced technical expertise, enabling app firms to better target their efforts in improving XR app experiences. • Developed a novel framework for classifying user reviews of mobile XR apps to identify feature concerns and suggestions. • Compared explainable smoke term-scoring techniques with deep learning-based BERT classification to enhance feedback analysis. • Conducted an exploratory qualitative analysis comparing XR and non-XR app feedback, revealing distinct user concerns around immersion, safety, and device limitations. • Found XR users are more likely to suggest updates to existing features and propose new safety features, highlighting the unique demands of immersive technologies. • Demonstrated how automated feedback tools can improve XR app development by streamlining issue detection and guiding feature refinement.

Decision Support SystemsVol. 195
San Diego State University (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Mobile and Web Applications
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.