The Impact of Gravity on Different Height Systems: A Case Study on Mt. Medvednica

This study examines the influence of gravity on different height systems by integrating Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), leveling, and gravimetric measurements. Although the theoretical influence of gravity on height systems is well known, empirical studies that quantify these effects along steep terrain are rare—particularly within the Croatian reference systems. Geometric leveling, recognized for its precision in geodesy, was employed alongside gravimetric data to analyze the relationship between gravity variations and height differences. The research was conducted along Sljeme Road on Mt. Medvednica, Croatia, where altitude-dependent gravity effects were systematically investigated along an elevation profile with a height difference of about 650 m. GNSS measurements provided positional coordinates referenced to the Croatian Terrestrial Reference System 1996 (HTRS96) (EPSG:4888), while leveling and gravimetric data were analyzed within the Croatian Height Reference System 1971 (HVRS71) (EPSG:5610) and Croatian Gravimetric Reference System 2003 (HGRS03), respectively. The results demonstrate that differences between geometric and normal–orthometric heights become more pronounced at higher elevations but remain at the millimeter level. Notably, the impact of gravity is evident in normal and orthometric heights, with differences from geometric heights reaching up to 3.7 cm at the highest points. Additionally, a comparison between normal and orthometric heights reveals that at the beginning of the leveling line, the difference is around 4 mm. However, as the elevation increases, this difference grows, reaching over 1 cm at the end of the leveling line. The study also confirms the theoretical correlation between the geoid–quasigeoid height difference and terrain elevation, with increasing differences observed at higher altitudes. To examine the consistency of different height determination methods, two approaches were applied: one based on adjustment within the geopotential system, and the other involving direct adjustment in the desired height system, with specific height corrections applied. The results confirmed that the height differences between the two methods were 0, to the tenth of a millimeter, indicating that both methods provided identical results. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of geodetic height systems and the role of gravity in height determination.