Inverse modeling, analysis and control of twin rotor aerodynamic systems with optimized artificial intelligent controllers

This paper suggests a novel optimal inverse Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network model for the control of Twin Rotor Aerodynamic Systems (TRAS), such as Multi-Input-Multi-Output (MIMO) systems with high nonlinearity and coupling effects between channels. After analyzing and linearizing the dynamic model, TRAS is decoupled into two Single Input Single Output (SISO) systems, thereby creating vertical (pitch model) and horizontal (yaw model) systems. The relationship between the output angle of each subsystem and the input voltage is modeled using the inverse RBF neural network. The weights, biases, centers and widths of the Gaussian function are unknown parameters of the proposed inverse neural model, and they are obtained using Atom Search Optimization (ASO). A combination of the proportional derivative controller and the proposed inverse neural model fed forward controller is then applied to control the angles of each subsystem with different conditions. The simulation results showed that the proposed controller demonstrates noticeable performance improvements over the Fractional Order PID (FOPID) and Particle Swarm Optimization-PID (PSO-PID) controllers. Compared to FOPID, it achieves an 88.3% faster rise time, a 96.0% faster settling time, and a 93.8% lower overshoot for the Yaw model, along with a 42.8% faster rise time, a 73.9% faster settling time, and an 86.8% lower overshoot for the Pitch model. In comparison to PSO-PID, the Yaw model shows a 36.2% faster rise time, an 86.7% faster settling time, and a 59.7% lower overshoot, while the Pitch model exhibits a 58.4% slower rise time but compensates with a 59.9% faster settling time and a 71.2% lower overshoot. Additionally, integral performance indices are notably reduced for the proposed controller.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322999
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Magnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inverse modeling, analysis and control of twin rotor aerodynamic systems with optimized artificial intelligent controllers

Ali Hussien Mary, Ahmad A. Al-Talabi, Taqwa Oday Fahad, A. Mohammed
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Magnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics
1.21
article

Inverse modeling, analysis and control of twin rotor aerodynamic systems with optimized artificial intelligent controllers

Ali Hussien Mary, Ahmad A. Al-Talabi, Taqwa Oday Fahad, A. Mohammed
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper suggests a novel optimal inverse Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network model for the control of Twin Rotor Aerodynamic Systems (TRAS), such as Multi-Input-Multi-Output (MIMO) systems with high nonlinearity and coupling effects between channels. After analyzing and linearizing the dynamic model, TRAS is decoupled into two Single Input Single Output (SISO) systems, thereby creating vertical (pitch model) and horizontal (yaw model) systems. The relationship between the output angle of each subsystem and the input voltage is modeled using the inverse RBF neural network. The weights, biases, centers and widths of the Gaussian function are unknown parameters of the proposed inverse neural model, and they are obtained using Atom Search Optimization (ASO). A combination of the proportional derivative controller and the proposed inverse neural model fed forward controller is then applied to control the angles of each subsystem with different conditions. The simulation results showed that the proposed controller demonstrates noticeable performance improvements over the Fractional Order PID (FOPID) and Particle Swarm Optimization-PID (PSO-PID) controllers. Compared to FOPID, it achieves an 88.3% faster rise time, a 96.0% faster settling time, and a 93.8% lower overshoot for the Yaw model, along with a 42.8% faster rise time, a 73.9% faster settling time, and an 86.8% lower overshoot for the Pitch model. In comparison to PSO-PID, the Yaw model shows a 36.2% faster rise time, an 86.7% faster settling time, and a 59.7% lower overshoot, while the Pitch model exhibits a 58.4% slower rise time but compensates with a 59.9% faster settling time and a 71.2% lower overshoot. Additionally, integral performance indices are notably reduced for the proposed controller.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(5)
University of Baghdad (IQ), University of Technology - Iraq (IQ), Alsalam University College (IQ), University of Information Technology and Communications (IQ)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Magnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.