Diálogos institucionais e controle de constitucionalidade: caminhos para interpretação do inciso X do art. 52 da Constituição Federal

The article examines the interpretation of article 52, item X, of the Federal Constitution, which grants the Senate the power to suspend the enforcement of laws declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Federal Court. It analyzes the jurisprudential evolution of this provision, with an emphasis on the theory of constitutional mutation and the abstraction of diffusejudicial review. The study is based on the theory of institutional dialogues,exploring the tensions between the Judiciary and the Legislative branches.The research proposes a dialogical approach to the interpretation of the citedprovision, framing it as a technique for institutional dialogues between theCourt and Parliament, aimed at adopting minimalist stances in constitutional jurisdiction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Plenário – Revista Jurídica da Câmara dos Deputados
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51206/plenario.v1i1.8
Primary Topic
Brazilian Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diálogos institucionais e controle de constitucionalidade: caminhos para interpretação do inciso X do art. 52 da Constituição Federal

Bruno Dantas, Guilherme Mazarello
Plenário – Revista Jurídica da Câmara dos Deputados
Brazilian Legal Issues
article

Diálogos institucionais e controle de constitucionalidade: caminhos para interpretação do inciso X do art. 52 da Constituição Federal

Bruno Dantas, Guilherme Mazarello
article en

Abstract

The article examines the interpretation of article 52, item X, of the Federal Constitution, which grants the Senate the power to suspend the enforcement of laws declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Federal Court. It analyzes the jurisprudential evolution of this provision, with an emphasis on the theory of constitutional mutation and the abstraction of diffusejudicial review. The study is based on the theory of institutional dialogues,exploring the tensions between the Judiciary and the Legislative branches.The research proposes a dialogical approach to the interpretation of the citedprovision, framing it as a technique for institutional dialogues between theCourt and Parliament, aimed at adopting minimalist stances in constitutional jurisdiction.

Plenário – Revista Jurídica da Câmara dos DeputadosVol. 1(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Brazilian Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.