ICT Access and Inequality in Global Reading Achievement: Cross-Level Interactions and Compensatory Effects in PISA 2018

This study analyzed Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2018 data (N = 612, 004 students across 79 countries) using hierarchical linear modeling to examine relationships between information and communication technologies (ICT) and reading achievement. Student-level predictors included home access, skills, attitudes, and usage patterns; school-level factors comprised infrastructure, resources, and classroom integration. Findings revealed complex relationships with student-level factors, with home access and perceived competence showing positive associations but excessive academic technology use relating negatively to reading scores. Country-level analysis demonstrated that ICT resource inequality correlated negatively with reading achievement regardless of absolute resource levels. Most significantly, cross-level interactions indicated compensatory rather than amplifying effects, with home technology access showing stronger positive associations with reading achievement in technology-poor schools. These findings challenge concerns that educational technology inherently widens achievement gaps and suggests strategic resource allocation could potentially narrow disparities. Results support a nuanced perspective toward technology in education, emphasizing equitable distribution and context-specific implementation rather than universal approaches to digital integration.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education and Training Studies
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v13i3.7619
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ICT Access and Inequality in Global Reading Achievement: Cross-Level Interactions and Compensatory Effects in PISA 2018

Nirmal Ghimire, Sushila Regmi
2 citations
Journal of Education and Training Studies
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
17.04
article

ICT Access and Inequality in Global Reading Achievement: Cross-Level Interactions and Compensatory Effects in PISA 2018

Nirmal Ghimire, Sushila Regmi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study analyzed Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2018 data (N = 612, 004 students across 79 countries) using hierarchical linear modeling to examine relationships between information and communication technologies (ICT) and reading achievement. Student-level predictors included home access, skills, attitudes, and usage patterns; school-level factors comprised infrastructure, resources, and classroom integration. Findings revealed complex relationships with student-level factors, with home access and perceived competence showing positive associations but excessive academic technology use relating negatively to reading scores. Country-level analysis demonstrated that ICT resource inequality correlated negatively with reading achievement regardless of absolute resource levels. Most significantly, cross-level interactions indicated compensatory rather than amplifying effects, with home technology access showing stronger positive associations with reading achievement in technology-poor schools. These findings challenge concerns that educational technology inherently widens achievement gaps and suggests strategic resource allocation could potentially narrow disparities. Results support a nuanced perspective toward technology in education, emphasizing equitable distribution and context-specific implementation rather than universal approaches to digital integration.

Journal of Education and Training StudiesVol. 13(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.