Evaluating Sepsis Management and Patient Outcomes: A Comprehensive Retrospective Study of Clinical and Treatment Data

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Sepsis, as a major cause of mortality worldwide, requires timely diagnosis and prompt treatment to improve patient outcomes. In this study, we evaluated sepsis management strategies and their impact on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective study was conducted by analyzing clinical and treatment data from the electronic records of sepsis patients who had been admitted to tertiary care hospitals in eastern Saudi Arabia. Using systematic sampling, the details of eligible patients were obtained. Data were collected on patient demographics, vital signs, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and laboratory parameters, treatment (antibiotic therapy, vasopressor use, or fluid resuscitation), and outcomes (survival in hospital). Statistical analyses were performed to assess the association between clinical and treatment strategies and patient outcomes. <b>Results:</b> A total of 234 sepsis cases were analyzed, of which 70.9% were survivors and 29.1% were non-survivors. Patients aged 60 years and above were the most affected. Statistically significant differences were observed across all of the measured vital sign variables and outcomes (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Based on SOFA scores, 56.41% of patients were assessed as having a moderate risk. Through our comparison of clinical and laboratory parameters between survivors and non-survivors, significant differences were found in all of the measured variables (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). The odds of survival were significantly higher in those who received early administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics (OR = 4.9449, <i>p</i> = 0.0001), vasopressor therapy (OR = 1.9408, <i>p</i> = 0.0262), and fluid resuscitation OR = 11.035, <i>p</i> = 0.0001). <b>Conclusions:</b> The results of this study highlight the importance of early sepsis recognition, prompt antibiotic therapy, and standardized protocol adherence in improving patient outcomes and reducing mortality and morbidity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103555
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Sepsis Management and Patient Outcomes: A Comprehensive Retrospective Study of Clinical and Treatment Data

Abeer Abbas Alabdullatif, Sahbanathul Missiriya Jalal, Suhail Hassan Jalal, Kamilah Essa Alasmakh et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
2.71
article

Evaluating Sepsis Management and Patient Outcomes: A Comprehensive Retrospective Study of Clinical and Treatment Data

Abeer Abbas Alabdullatif, Sahbanathul Missiriya Jalal, Suhail Hassan Jalal, Kamilah Essa Alasmakh, Zahraa Hussain Alnasser, Wadiah Yousef Alhamdan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Sepsis, as a major cause of mortality worldwide, requires timely diagnosis and prompt treatment to improve patient outcomes. In this study, we evaluated sepsis management strategies and their impact on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective study was conducted by analyzing clinical and treatment data from the electronic records of sepsis patients who had been admitted to tertiary care hospitals in eastern Saudi Arabia. Using systematic sampling, the details of eligible patients were obtained. Data were collected on patient demographics, vital signs, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and laboratory parameters, treatment (antibiotic therapy, vasopressor use, or fluid resuscitation), and outcomes (survival in hospital). Statistical analyses were performed to assess the association between clinical and treatment strategies and patient outcomes. <b>Results:</b> A total of 234 sepsis cases were analyzed, of which 70.9% were survivors and 29.1% were non-survivors. Patients aged 60 years and above were the most affected. Statistically significant differences were observed across all of the measured vital sign variables and outcomes (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Based on SOFA scores, 56.41% of patients were assessed as having a moderate risk. Through our comparison of clinical and laboratory parameters between survivors and non-survivors, significant differences were found in all of the measured variables (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). The odds of survival were significantly higher in those who received early administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics (OR = 4.9449, <i>p</i> = 0.0001), vasopressor therapy (OR = 1.9408, <i>p</i> = 0.0262), and fluid resuscitation OR = 11.035, <i>p</i> = 0.0001). <b>Conclusions:</b> The results of this study highlight the importance of early sepsis recognition, prompt antibiotic therapy, and standardized protocol adherence in improving patient outcomes and reducing mortality and morbidity.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(10)
Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University (IN), King Faisal University (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.