A comprehensive analysis of two types of xenogeneic bone particles for use in maxillofacial bone regeneration therapies

Regeneration of maxillofacial bone structures is challenging. One strategy for bone damage repair involves using bone filler particles. This study analyzed the regenerative potential of deproteinized bone particles (DP) and collagen-based bone particles (CP) to determine the effectiveness of each biomaterial in bone repair. Structural analysis using scanning electron microscopy and 3D scanning showed that DP and CP were structurally similar, comprising a heterogeneous mixture of bone particles of varying sizes and shapes. Ex vivo analyses, including morphological evaluation, LIVE & DEAD assays, and DNA quantification, demonstrated high biocompatibility of CP and DP with human cells in both direct and indirect contact at 24, 48, and 72 hours. Both particles were grafted onto Wistar rats with a critical mandibular defect for two months. Computed tomography revealed significant defect reduction in the CP group, but not in the DP group, compared to negative controls without any bone particles. Histological analysis showed biocompatibility of both particles in vivo and identified regenerative tissue with collagen fibers and mineralized spots in CP and DP, with more mineralized spots in DP. Histochemistry and immunohistochemistry confirmed collagen, proteoglycans, and osteocalcin presence in the regeneration area of CP and DP. These results confirm the biocompatibility and potential of both particle types for maxillofacial bone regeneration, particularly CP. Future studies should assess their clinical usefulness for patients with cleft palate, mandibular damage, and other maxillofacial applications involving tissue engineering techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323754
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comprehensive analysis of two types of xenogeneic bone particles for use in maxillofacial bone regeneration therapies

Olimpia Ortiz‐Arrabal, Ricardo Fernández‐Valadés, Miguel Alaminos, Miguel Ángel Martín‐Piedra et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
1.84
article

A comprehensive analysis of two types of xenogeneic bone particles for use in maxillofacial bone regeneration therapies

Olimpia Ortiz‐Arrabal, Ricardo Fernández‐Valadés, Miguel Alaminos, Miguel Ángel Martín‐Piedra, Víctor Carriel, Antonio España‐López, Jesús Chato‐Astrain, Mario A. Rodríguez, Ingrid Garzón, Ismael Ángel Rodríguez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Regeneration of maxillofacial bone structures is challenging. One strategy for bone damage repair involves using bone filler particles. This study analyzed the regenerative potential of deproteinized bone particles (DP) and collagen-based bone particles (CP) to determine the effectiveness of each biomaterial in bone repair. Structural analysis using scanning electron microscopy and 3D scanning showed that DP and CP were structurally similar, comprising a heterogeneous mixture of bone particles of varying sizes and shapes. Ex vivo analyses, including morphological evaluation, LIVE & DEAD assays, and DNA quantification, demonstrated high biocompatibility of CP and DP with human cells in both direct and indirect contact at 24, 48, and 72 hours. Both particles were grafted onto Wistar rats with a critical mandibular defect for two months. Computed tomography revealed significant defect reduction in the CP group, but not in the DP group, compared to negative controls without any bone particles. Histological analysis showed biocompatibility of both particles in vivo and identified regenerative tissue with collagen fibers and mineralized spots in CP and DP, with more mineralized spots in DP. Histochemistry and immunohistochemistry confirmed collagen, proteoglycans, and osteocalcin presence in the regeneration area of CP and DP. These results confirm the biocompatibility and potential of both particle types for maxillofacial bone regeneration, particularly CP. Future studies should assess their clinical usefulness for patients with cleft palate, mandibular damage, and other maxillofacial applications involving tissue engineering techniques.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(5)
Universidad de Granada (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves (ES), Cordoba University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
1.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.