Goodness of fit tests in spatial autoregressive stochastic frontier models

This article mainly considers goodness of fit tests for the inefficiency in spatial autoregressive stochastic frontier (SARSF) models by utilizing the characteristic function of the centralized composite error term. As a prerequisite of the tests, we propose easy-to-compute moment estimators for distributional parameters of such a term, showing the consistency based on spatial near-epoch dependent properties. Meanwhile, the asymptotic distribution of the estimators is derived by generalizing the central limit theorem (CLT) in Kelejian and Prucha (Citation2001) from linear-quadratic forms to polynomial-trigonometric forms. Then, the cosine and sine tests, being simple to implement in SARSF analysis, are established to explore the distributional structure of the centered error. With the help of the generalized CLT, both trigonometry statistics are proved to follow an asymptotically chi-square distribution. Moreover, Monte Carlo simulation is conducted to investigate the finite sample performance of the moment estimators and trigonometry tests. Finally, in the efficiency analysis of Chinese A-shared listed companies in 2005, our tests reject the half-normal and exponential distributions and fail to reject the gamma one. This conforms to our subsequent calculation that the efficiency estimates based on the gamma model potentially lie within a more realistic range, but the other two models lead to significant distortions in efficiency estimates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Econometric Reviews
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2025.2503352
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Goodness of fit tests in spatial autoregressive stochastic frontier models

Yue Fu, Levent Kutlu, Ming-Yu Deng, Mingxi Wang
1 citations
Econometric Reviews
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
3.13
article

Goodness of fit tests in spatial autoregressive stochastic frontier models

Yue Fu, Levent Kutlu, Ming-Yu Deng, Mingxi Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article mainly considers goodness of fit tests for the inefficiency in spatial autoregressive stochastic frontier (SARSF) models by utilizing the characteristic function of the centralized composite error term. As a prerequisite of the tests, we propose easy-to-compute moment estimators for distributional parameters of such a term, showing the consistency based on spatial near-epoch dependent properties. Meanwhile, the asymptotic distribution of the estimators is derived by generalizing the central limit theorem (CLT) in Kelejian and Prucha (Citation2001) from linear-quadratic forms to polynomial-trigonometric forms. Then, the cosine and sine tests, being simple to implement in SARSF analysis, are established to explore the distributional structure of the centered error. With the help of the generalized CLT, both trigonometry statistics are proved to follow an asymptotically chi-square distribution. Moreover, Monte Carlo simulation is conducted to investigate the finite sample performance of the moment estimators and trigonometry tests. Finally, in the efficiency analysis of Chinese A-shared listed companies in 2005, our tests reject the half-normal and exponential distributions and fail to reject the gamma one. This conforms to our subsequent calculation that the efficiency estimates based on the gamma model potentially lie within a more realistic range, but the other two models lead to significant distortions in efficiency estimates.

Econometric ReviewsVol. 44(8)
University of International Business and Economics (CN), Anhui University of Finance and Economics (CN), The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.