Collaborative Modelling of Activities to Support the Teaching of Programming: An Empirical Study

Although the practical benefits of incorporating collaborative work into education have been highlighted, there has been little emphasis on a fundamental part: the design of the inherent collaborative processes. Collaborative engineering emphasises the use of collaboration patterns and thinkLets as primary design units, with reusability as an essential goal. This paper presents the design and validation of the collaborative activity “Peer Code Review”, aimed at supporting the teaching of introductory programming courses using collaboration patterns and thinkLets. A controlled experiment with 79 students of introductory programming courses demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The results showed that students in the experimental groups achieved significantly higher grades than those in the control groups. These results validate the positive impact of the peer code review activity on academic performance and confirm its potential as an effective collaborative learning strategy for teaching programming.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Interaction design & architecture(s)/ID&A Interaction design & architecture(s)
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-063-007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaborative Modelling of Activities to Support the Teaching of Programming: An Empirical Study

Alexander Álvaro Barón Salazar, Óscar Revelo Sánchez, César A. Collazos
1 citations
Interaction design & architecture(s)/ID&A Interaction design & architecture(s)
Teaching and Learning Programming
0.41
article

Collaborative Modelling of Activities to Support the Teaching of Programming: An Empirical Study

Alexander Álvaro Barón Salazar, Óscar Revelo Sánchez, César A. Collazos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although the practical benefits of incorporating collaborative work into education have been highlighted, there has been little emphasis on a fundamental part: the design of the inherent collaborative processes. Collaborative engineering emphasises the use of collaboration patterns and thinkLets as primary design units, with reusability as an essential goal. This paper presents the design and validation of the collaborative activity “Peer Code Review”, aimed at supporting the teaching of introductory programming courses using collaboration patterns and thinkLets. A controlled experiment with 79 students of introductory programming courses demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The results showed that students in the experimental groups achieved significantly higher grades than those in the control groups. These results validate the positive impact of the peer code review activity on academic performance and confirm its potential as an effective collaborative learning strategy for teaching programming.

Interaction design & architecture(s)/ID&A Interaction design & architecture(s)(63)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Teaching and Learning Programming
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.