Comparative Analysis of High-Order Rotor Hopfield Neural Networks and Dense Associative Memory: Structural Similarities and Functional Differences

This study presents a comparative analysis of Highorder Rotor Hopfield Neural Networks (HRHNNs) and Dense Associative Memory (DAM) models, highlighting their structural similarities and functional differences in associative memory tasks. Both models use energy functions to store patterns as lowenergy states, but they vary in handling multi-valued patterns and synaptic architectures. HRHNNs leverage high-order connections and multi-body synapses, which enhance their capacity for multivalued pattern storage and retrieval. In contrast, DAM operates with binary patterns and employs an energy difference learning algorithm. The experiments target multi-valued associative memory tasks for both HRHNNs and DAM. Results show that HRHNNs outperform DAM under high load factors and complex multi-valued tasks, while DAM demonstrates robustness with a larger number of patterns. This work emphasizes the potential of integrating biologically interpretable synaptic structures into artificial neural networks to enhance associative memory performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icnc64304.2024.10987667
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of High-Order Rotor Hopfield Neural Networks and Dense Associative Memory: Structural Similarities and Functional Differences

Bingxuan Chen, Hao Zhang
Neural Networks and Applications
article

Comparative Analysis of High-Order Rotor Hopfield Neural Networks and Dense Associative Memory: Structural Similarities and Functional Differences

Bingxuan Chen, Hao Zhang
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of Highorder Rotor Hopfield Neural Networks (HRHNNs) and Dense Associative Memory (DAM) models, highlighting their structural similarities and functional differences in associative memory tasks. Both models use energy functions to store patterns as lowenergy states, but they vary in handling multi-valued patterns and synaptic architectures. HRHNNs leverage high-order connections and multi-body synapses, which enhance their capacity for multivalued pattern storage and retrieval. In contrast, DAM operates with binary patterns and employs an energy difference learning algorithm. The experiments target multi-valued associative memory tasks for both HRHNNs and DAM. Results show that HRHNNs outperform DAM under high load factors and complex multi-valued tasks, while DAM demonstrates robustness with a larger number of patterns. This work emphasizes the potential of integrating biologically interpretable synaptic structures into artificial neural networks to enhance associative memory performance.

Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Neural Networks and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.