RPG-HBC: Reconfigurable Passive Galvanic Human Body Communication for Bioelectronic Implants Under Varying Channel Conditions

Wireless communication is vital for bioelectronic implants to transmit sensor data [1], [2]. Traditional methods like RF face high absorption in body tissues, leading to high power use and safety concerns [3]. Inductive coupling reduces absorption but has limited data rates [4], [5]. Emerging modalities such as optics [6], ultrasound [7], and magnetoelectric [8] have power, carrier frequency, and data rate trade-offs. Human-body communication (HBC) leverages body tissue as a communication medium and has been explored for wearable [9] and implants[10]. Capacitive HBC offers high energy efficiency and data rates for wearable [9], [11] but is less effective when implanted due to the lack of a ground path [12]. Galvanic HBC (G-HBC) uses two pairs of electrodes-one implanted and one on the skin surface-to transmit data by driving currents through the body (Fig. 1 top) [13], [14]. While G-HBC achieves high data rates with low power consumption and offers security [15], it is hindered by varying tissue conditions that alter electrode impedance, degrading performance [16]–[20].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cicc63670.2025.10982893
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Wireless Body Area Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RPG-HBC: Reconfigurable Passive Galvanic Human Body Communication for Bioelectronic Implants Under Varying Channel Conditions

Yiwei Zou, Ya-Ting Chang, Kaiyuan Yang, Wei Wang
2 citations
Wireless Body Area Networks
1.35
article

RPG-HBC: Reconfigurable Passive Galvanic Human Body Communication for Bioelectronic Implants Under Varying Channel Conditions

Yiwei Zou, Ya-Ting Chang, Kaiyuan Yang, Wei Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Wireless communication is vital for bioelectronic implants to transmit sensor data [1], [2]. Traditional methods like RF face high absorption in body tissues, leading to high power use and safety concerns [3]. Inductive coupling reduces absorption but has limited data rates [4], [5]. Emerging modalities such as optics [6], ultrasound [7], and magnetoelectric [8] have power, carrier frequency, and data rate trade-offs. Human-body communication (HBC) leverages body tissue as a communication medium and has been explored for wearable [9] and implants[10]. Capacitive HBC offers high energy efficiency and data rates for wearable [9], [11] but is less effective when implanted due to the lack of a ground path [12]. Galvanic HBC (G-HBC) uses two pairs of electrodes-one implanted and one on the skin surface-to transmit data by driving currents through the body (Fig. 1 top) [13], [14]. While G-HBC achieves high data rates with low power consumption and offers security [15], it is hindered by varying tissue conditions that alter electrode impedance, degrading performance [16]–[20].

Rice University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Wireless Body Area Networks
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.