A Comparative Measurement Strategy to Implement Precise On-Machine Measurement for Free-Form Surfaces

Accurate on-machine measurement (OMM) is crucial for enhancing machining accuracy and enabling adaptive machining operations. However, OMM accuracy is constrained by multiple error sources, including machine tool geometric errors and probe errors. To mitigate OMM accuracy limitations, this study proposes a comparative measurement strategy that enhances measurement reliability. In this method, the geometry of a machined workpiece is obtained by comparing it with a reference workpiece of the same nominal shape. The reference workpiece is calibrated using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM), and its measurement data serve as the truth surface. To achieve high repeatability, the comparative measurement process is conducted under symmetric clamping with rotary table assistance. The calibrated reference surface is reconstructed using B-spline surface fitting based on CMM-measured points. The deviations between the OMM points and the reconstructed reference surface are calculated using a point-to-surface distance approach. The calibrated surface is formed by assigning the deviations to the reference piece's design surface. Finally, the geometric form error of the test piece is then determined by calculating the distance between its OMM points and the calibrated reference surface. The viability of the proposed measurement strategy and the impact of clamping errors are analyzed via a numerical study. The accuracy of the strategy is demonstrated experimentally for both 3-axis and 5-axis OMM systems. Experimental results show that the proposed strategy reduces the measurement error from 36.7 μm to 9.1 μm for the 3-axis system, and from 63.3 μm to 20.2 μm for the 5-axis system, compared to the direct OMM strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2025.3571125
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Measurement Strategy to Implement Precise On-Machine Measurement for Free-Form Surfaces

Nuodi Huang, Haifeng Liu, Liyao Hou, Xu Chen et al.
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
0.71
article

A Comparative Measurement Strategy to Implement Precise On-Machine Measurement for Free-Form Surfaces

Nuodi Huang, Haifeng Liu, Liyao Hou, Xu Chen, Limin Zhu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurate on-machine measurement (OMM) is crucial for enhancing machining accuracy and enabling adaptive machining operations. However, OMM accuracy is constrained by multiple error sources, including machine tool geometric errors and probe errors. To mitigate OMM accuracy limitations, this study proposes a comparative measurement strategy that enhances measurement reliability. In this method, the geometry of a machined workpiece is obtained by comparing it with a reference workpiece of the same nominal shape. The reference workpiece is calibrated using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM), and its measurement data serve as the truth surface. To achieve high repeatability, the comparative measurement process is conducted under symmetric clamping with rotary table assistance. The calibrated reference surface is reconstructed using B-spline surface fitting based on CMM-measured points. The deviations between the OMM points and the reconstructed reference surface are calculated using a point-to-surface distance approach. The calibrated surface is formed by assigning the deviations to the reference piece's design surface. Finally, the geometric form error of the test piece is then determined by calculating the distance between its OMM points and the calibrated reference surface. The viability of the proposed measurement strategy and the impact of clamping errors are analyzed via a numerical study. The accuracy of the strategy is demonstrated experimentally for both 3-axis and 5-axis OMM systems. Experimental results show that the proposed strategy reduces the measurement error from 36.7 μm to 9.1 μm for the 3-axis system, and from 63.3 μm to 20.2 μm for the 5-axis system, compared to the direct OMM strategy.

IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementVol. 74
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), CNC Technology (Czechia) (CZ)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.