Spontaneous Content of Impressions of Naturalistic Face Photographs

Across two studies (N = 4,526), we characterize a taxonomy of spontaneous face impressions by applying artificial intelligence text analyses to thousands of free-response descriptions of computer-generated faces. The taxonomy codes almost 100% of the impressions into Appearance (including Beauty), Sociability, Morality, Ability, Assertiveness, Emotion, Social Group, socioeconomic Status, Uniqueness, Family, Health, Occupation, Geographic origin, and political-religious Beliefs content. Results suggest that dimensions from low-dimensional models (e.g., Communion, Agency facets) are highly prevalent, but that alternative dimensions such as Uniqueness and Health are also prevalent. Most dimensions show high (positive) directions, and their correlational structure supports the clustering of low-dimensional models as separate from the expanded taxonomy dimensions. Finally, the taxonomy improves predictions of general evaluations of faces (how positive/negative the face is evaluated overall) and decision making in hypothetical scenarios (e.g., how much to prioritize a target for health care access or antidiscrimination protections).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Cognition
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2025.43.2.114
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spontaneous Content of Impressions of Naturalistic Face Photographs

Alexander Todorov, Gandalf Nicolás, Stefan Uddenberg
3 citations
Social Cognition
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
6.92
article

Spontaneous Content of Impressions of Naturalistic Face Photographs

Alexander Todorov, Gandalf Nicolás, Stefan Uddenberg
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Across two studies (N = 4,526), we characterize a taxonomy of spontaneous face impressions by applying artificial intelligence text analyses to thousands of free-response descriptions of computer-generated faces. The taxonomy codes almost 100% of the impressions into Appearance (including Beauty), Sociability, Morality, Ability, Assertiveness, Emotion, Social Group, socioeconomic Status, Uniqueness, Family, Health, Occupation, Geographic origin, and political-religious Beliefs content. Results suggest that dimensions from low-dimensional models (e.g., Communion, Agency facets) are highly prevalent, but that alternative dimensions such as Uniqueness and Health are also prevalent. Most dimensions show high (positive) directions, and their correlational structure supports the clustering of low-dimensional models as separate from the expanded taxonomy dimensions. Finally, the taxonomy improves predictions of general evaluations of faces (how positive/negative the face is evaluated overall) and decision making in hypothetical scenarios (e.g., how much to prioritize a target for health care access or antidiscrimination protections).

Social CognitionVol. 43(2)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Chicago (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
6.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Spontaneous Content of Impressions of Naturalistic Face Photographs — Alexander Todorov, Gandalf Nicolás, et al. · Social Cognition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS