Ways of knowing in Slavic

Abstract Expanding on Carl Buck’s insight that the history of ideas is closely tied to the history of the words expressing them, this paper traces the interaction of language, culture and cognition on the example of the concept know and its lexification in Slavic, based on a sample of diachronically and synchronically aligned translations of the New Testament. Two exploratory analyses of the lexical preferences, the domains of conceptual transfer and their perceptual bases reveal characteristic differences in the choice of lexical means, slightly less for the underlying conceptual mappings and for their perceptual bases. The patterns disclosed do not correlate with the branches of Slavic, nor do they display a clear historical signal. Instead, they suggest a correlation with the cultural history of the New Testament translations. The results illustrate the relevance of a more-dimensional approach when comparing the lexical layer of languages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Languages in Contrast
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00055.son
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ways of knowing in Slavic

Barbara Sonnenhauser
Languages in Contrast
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

Ways of knowing in Slavic

Barbara Sonnenhauser
article en

Abstract

Abstract Expanding on Carl Buck’s insight that the history of ideas is closely tied to the history of the words expressing them, this paper traces the interaction of language, culture and cognition on the example of the concept know and its lexification in Slavic, based on a sample of diachronically and synchronically aligned translations of the New Testament. Two exploratory analyses of the lexical preferences, the domains of conceptual transfer and their perceptual bases reveal characteristic differences in the choice of lexical means, slightly less for the underlying conceptual mappings and for their perceptual bases. The patterns disclosed do not correlate with the branches of Slavic, nor do they display a clear historical signal. Instead, they suggest a correlation with the cultural history of the New Testament translations. The results illustrate the relevance of a more-dimensional approach when comparing the lexical layer of languages.

Languages in ContrastVol. 26(1)
University of Mons (BE), LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ways of knowing in Slavic — Barbara Sonnenhauser · Languages in Contrast (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS