Reelegibilidade nas Mesas Diretoras do Poder Legislativo à luz da nova jurisprudência do Supremo Tribunal Federal

The 1988 Federal Constitution established, in § 4th of its article 57, the basic rules to be observed by the Legislative Branch for the election of Executive Boards, including the prohibition of reappointment to the same position in the immediately subsequent election. This provision has always sparked debate within the scope of the Federal Supreme Court, particularly regarding its applicability to the legislative bodies of subnational entities. This article aims to examine the evolution of the Federal Supreme Court’s jurisprudence, especially following the judgment of ADI 6.524/DF, rapporteurjustice Gilmar Mendes, concerning the election of Legislative Executive Boards at the federal, state, and municipal levels, and to anticipate, if possible, new debates on this issue based on the jurisprudential principles recently established by the Supreme Court.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Plenário – Revista Jurídica da Câmara dos Deputados
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51206/plenario.v1i1.16
Primary Topic
Brazilian Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reelegibilidade nas Mesas Diretoras do Poder Legislativo à luz da nova jurisprudência do Supremo Tribunal Federal

Fabrício Juliano Mendes Medeiros
Plenário – Revista Jurídica da Câmara dos Deputados
Brazilian Legal Issues
article

Reelegibilidade nas Mesas Diretoras do Poder Legislativo à luz da nova jurisprudência do Supremo Tribunal Federal

Fabrício Juliano Mendes Medeiros
article en

Abstract

The 1988 Federal Constitution established, in § 4th of its article 57, the basic rules to be observed by the Legislative Branch for the election of Executive Boards, including the prohibition of reappointment to the same position in the immediately subsequent election. This provision has always sparked debate within the scope of the Federal Supreme Court, particularly regarding its applicability to the legislative bodies of subnational entities. This article aims to examine the evolution of the Federal Supreme Court’s jurisprudence, especially following the judgment of ADI 6.524/DF, rapporteurjustice Gilmar Mendes, concerning the election of Legislative Executive Boards at the federal, state, and municipal levels, and to anticipate, if possible, new debates on this issue based on the jurisprudential principles recently established by the Supreme Court.

Plenário – Revista Jurídica da Câmara dos DeputadosVol. 1(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Brazilian Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.