Empowering safer socially sensitive autonomous vehicles using human-plausible cognitive encoding

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) will soon cruise our roads as a global undertaking. Beyond completing driving tasks, AVs are expected to incorporate ethical considerations into their operation. However, a critical challenge remains. When multiple road users are involved, their impacts on AV ethical decision-making are distinct yet interrelated. Current AVs lack social sensitivity in ethical decisions, failing to enable both differentiated consideration of road users and a holistic view of their collective impact. Drawing on research in AV ethics and neuroscience, we propose a scheme based on social concern and human-plausible cognitive encoding. Specifically, we first assess the individual impact that each road user poses to the AV based on risk. Then, social concern can differentiate these impacts by weighting the risks according to road user categories. Through cognitive encoding, these independent impacts are holistically encoded into a behavioral belief, which in turn supports ethical decisions that consider the collective impact of all involved parties. A total of two thousand benchmark scenarios from CommonRoad are used for evaluation. Empirical results show that our scheme enables safer and more ethical decisions, reducing overall risk by 26.3%, with a notable 22.9% decrease for vulnerable road users. In accidents, we enhance self-protection by 8.3%, improve protection for all road users by 17.6%, and significantly boost protection for vulnerable road users by 51.7%. As a human-inspired practice, this work renders AVs socially sensitive to overcome future ethical challenges in everyday driving.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2401626122
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empowering safer socially sensitive autonomous vehicles using human-plausible cognitive encoding

Yinhai Wang, Chao Lu, Hai Yang, Meixin Zhu et al.
5 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
11.83
article

Empowering safer socially sensitive autonomous vehicles using human-plausible cognitive encoding

Yinhai Wang, Chao Lu, Hai Yang, Meixin Zhu, Hongliang Lü, Shuo Feng, Xuesong Wang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) will soon cruise our roads as a global undertaking. Beyond completing driving tasks, AVs are expected to incorporate ethical considerations into their operation. However, a critical challenge remains. When multiple road users are involved, their impacts on AV ethical decision-making are distinct yet interrelated. Current AVs lack social sensitivity in ethical decisions, failing to enable both differentiated consideration of road users and a holistic view of their collective impact. Drawing on research in AV ethics and neuroscience, we propose a scheme based on social concern and human-plausible cognitive encoding. Specifically, we first assess the individual impact that each road user poses to the AV based on risk. Then, social concern can differentiate these impacts by weighting the risks according to road user categories. Through cognitive encoding, these independent impacts are holistically encoded into a behavioral belief, which in turn supports ethical decisions that consider the collective impact of all involved parties. A total of two thousand benchmark scenarios from CommonRoad are used for evaluation. Empirical results show that our scheme enables safer and more ethical decisions, reducing overall risk by 26.3%, with a notable 22.9% decrease for vulnerable road users. In accidents, we enhance self-protection by 8.3%, improve protection for all road users by 17.6%, and significantly boost protection for vulnerable road users by 51.7%. As a human-inspired practice, this work renders AVs socially sensitive to overcome future ethical challenges in everyday driving.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(21)
Tongji University (CN), Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), University of Washington (US), Engineering (Italy) (IT), Tsinghua University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
11.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.