Soft skills development methods in higher education: a systematic literature review

Purpose The systematic review adheres to the methodology outlined in the practical guide by Petticrew and Roberts (2006). Following this approach, research questions were initially formulated, as detailed in the introduction section. Subsequently, databases were selected, and research terms were defined. The search, conducted in September 2023, encompassed five databases, excluding medical or health sciences education. Design/methodology/approach This systematic literature review paper comprehensively examines studies on soft skill development methods in higher education published from 2010 to 2023. Findings Findings unveiled a discernible surge in research interest in soft skill development, particularly in Hong Kong (China) and Morocco, alongside a global representation. The engineering discipline emerged as the predominant focus in the examined studies. In terms of the methods employed for soft skill cultivation, prominent approaches included project-based learning, blended learning, cooperative education, experiential learning, e-learning and volunteering. Originality/value A notable gap in the existing literature is the absence of a review that synthesizes different soft skill development methods. The current study aims to fill this gap by providing a holistic overview of various soft skill development strategies, contributing a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted nature of soft skill development.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-02-2025-0050
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Higher Education and Employability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soft skills development methods in higher education: a systematic literature review

Shamsa Aziz
4 citations
Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning
Higher Education and Employability
35.70
article

Soft skills development methods in higher education: a systematic literature review

Shamsa Aziz
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Purpose The systematic review adheres to the methodology outlined in the practical guide by Petticrew and Roberts (2006). Following this approach, research questions were initially formulated, as detailed in the introduction section. Subsequently, databases were selected, and research terms were defined. The search, conducted in September 2023, encompassed five databases, excluding medical or health sciences education. Design/methodology/approach This systematic literature review paper comprehensively examines studies on soft skill development methods in higher education published from 2010 to 2023. Findings Findings unveiled a discernible surge in research interest in soft skill development, particularly in Hong Kong (China) and Morocco, alongside a global representation. The engineering discipline emerged as the predominant focus in the examined studies. In terms of the methods employed for soft skill cultivation, prominent approaches included project-based learning, blended learning, cooperative education, experiential learning, e-learning and volunteering. Originality/value A notable gap in the existing literature is the absence of a review that synthesizes different soft skill development methods. The current study aims to fill this gap by providing a holistic overview of various soft skill development strategies, contributing a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted nature of soft skill development.

Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Higher Education and Employability
35.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.