Effects of local enemal matrix protein on osseointegration of different surface Titanium implants

The aim of this study is to investigate the osseointegration levels of implants with different surfaces locally applied with enamel matrix protein by biomechanical methods. Thirty adult female Spraque Dawley rats weighing 300–350 g were included in the study as subjects. The rats were divided into 3 groups with 10 rats in each group: Machined Surface Group (n = 10), Sandblasted Large Acid Grid (SLA) Surface Group (n = 10) and Resorbable Blasting Material (RBM) Surface Group (n = 10). Titanium implants were surgically placed in the right tibias of the rats with sterile physiological serum cooling. Immediately before the implants were placed, local enamel matrix protein was applied to the prepared sockets and then the implants were placed. The rats were euthanized after waiting for osseointegration for four weeks and the implants were taken with the surrounding bone tissues after the soft tissues were removed. The bone–implant contact of all implants was analyzed by biomechanical method and recorded in Newton·cm-1 (N·cm-1). When the obtained biomechanical data were examined, the average bone–implant contact value was found to be 2.24 ± 0.67 (N·cm-1) in machined surface implants, 4.5 ± 1.36 (N·cm-1) in SLA surface implants and 3.24 ± 0.94 (N·cm-1) in RBM surface implants. A statistically difference was detected between machined surface implants and SLA surface implants (P<0.05; P=0.02). It can be stated that local enamel matrix protein application may increase bone–implant connection in SLA surface implants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Científica de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52973/rcfcv-e35625
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of local enemal matrix protein on osseointegration of different surface Titanium implants

Murat Tanrısever, Erhan Cahit Özcan, Alihan Bozoğlan, Ümit Koray Can et al.
1 citations
Revista Científica de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
1.84
article

Effects of local enemal matrix protein on osseointegration of different surface Titanium implants

Murat Tanrısever, Erhan Cahit Özcan, Alihan Bozoğlan, Ümit Koray Can, Kevser Sökmen, Özmen İstek, Serkan Dündar, Turker Gelic
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the osseointegration levels of implants with different surfaces locally applied with enamel matrix protein by biomechanical methods. Thirty adult female Spraque Dawley rats weighing 300–350 g were included in the study as subjects. The rats were divided into 3 groups with 10 rats in each group: Machined Surface Group (n = 10), Sandblasted Large Acid Grid (SLA) Surface Group (n = 10) and Resorbable Blasting Material (RBM) Surface Group (n = 10). Titanium implants were surgically placed in the right tibias of the rats with sterile physiological serum cooling. Immediately before the implants were placed, local enamel matrix protein was applied to the prepared sockets and then the implants were placed. The rats were euthanized after waiting for osseointegration for four weeks and the implants were taken with the surrounding bone tissues after the soft tissues were removed. The bone–implant contact of all implants was analyzed by biomechanical method and recorded in Newton·cm-1 (N·cm-1). When the obtained biomechanical data were examined, the average bone–implant contact value was found to be 2.24 ± 0.67 (N·cm-1) in machined surface implants, 4.5 ± 1.36 (N·cm-1) in SLA surface implants and 3.24 ± 0.94 (N·cm-1) in RBM surface implants. A statistically difference was detected between machined surface implants and SLA surface implants (P<0.05; P=0.02). It can be stated that local enamel matrix protein application may increase bone–implant connection in SLA surface implants.

Revista Científica de la Facultad de Ciencias VeterinariasVol. 35(2)
Muş Alparslan University (TR), Fırat University (TR), Alanya University (TR), Elazığ Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
1.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.