Assessment of Nursing Professionals' Knowledge and Management of Healthcare Waste in a Regional Surgical Center in the Federal District

Objective: To analyze the knowledge of nursing professionals regarding the management and handling of healthcare waste in a regional surgical center in the Federal District. Method: This is an observational, descriptive study with a quantitative approach, utilizing semi-structured interviews as a data collection instrument. Results and Discussion: Results and Discussion: Of a total of 46 professionals (100%), 37 were nursing technicians (80.4%) and 9 were nurses (19.6%), with the technical team representing the majority of the workforce in direct patient care. Most professionals correctly classified the waste, as follows: Group A (89.1%); Group B (76.1%); Group D (89.1%); and Group E (84.3%) - the lowest percentage was observed in Group B – leftover medications and glutaraldehyde. The lack of a trash can for common waste and the same treatment given to waste from clean and infected surgeries resulted in an increase in infectious waste. Research Implications: Despite the technical knowledge of these professionals, there are still structural and operational challenges within the surgical center that directly impact the segregation and proper disposal of these materials. Originality and Value: This study opens avenues for discussing healthcare waste in high-complexity environments, highlighting the relevance of correct segregation and its impact on public health and the environment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v19n5-072
Primary Topic
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Nursing Professionals' Knowledge and Management of Healthcare Waste in a Regional Surgical Center in the Federal District

Edivalda Pereira de Abreu, Marcelo Moreira Corgozinho, Raquel Barcellos Marques Schiffer, Kelry Barbosa Pereira et al.
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
article

Assessment of Nursing Professionals' Knowledge and Management of Healthcare Waste in a Regional Surgical Center in the Federal District

Edivalda Pereira de Abreu, Marcelo Moreira Corgozinho, Raquel Barcellos Marques Schiffer, Kelry Barbosa Pereira, Beatriz Cardoso Costa da Silva, Paulo Henrique Luz Sena
article en

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the knowledge of nursing professionals regarding the management and handling of healthcare waste in a regional surgical center in the Federal District. Method: This is an observational, descriptive study with a quantitative approach, utilizing semi-structured interviews as a data collection instrument. Results and Discussion: Results and Discussion: Of a total of 46 professionals (100%), 37 were nursing technicians (80.4%) and 9 were nurses (19.6%), with the technical team representing the majority of the workforce in direct patient care. Most professionals correctly classified the waste, as follows: Group A (89.1%); Group B (76.1%); Group D (89.1%); and Group E (84.3%) - the lowest percentage was observed in Group B – leftover medications and glutaraldehyde. The lack of a trash can for common waste and the same treatment given to waste from clean and infected surgeries resulted in an increase in infectious waste. Research Implications: Despite the technical knowledge of these professionals, there are still structural and operational challenges within the surgical center that directly impact the segregation and proper disposal of these materials. Originality and Value: This study opens avenues for discussing healthcare waste in high-complexity environments, highlighting the relevance of correct segregation and its impact on public health and the environment.

Revista de Gestão Social e AmbientalVol. 19(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.