The Determinants Of Esg Ratings Disagreement – Evidence From China

This study examines ESG rating disagreement among Chinese A-share listed firms using data from five major ESG rating agencies between 2010 and 2019. We construct three measures of rating divergence and analyze how firm characteristics influence these differences. Our findings reveal that the significance of explanatory variables varies depending on the definition of ESG disagreement and the combination of ratings used. While some variables, such as state ownership and profitability, show inconsistent effects, others, like firm size, leverage, and innovation activity, consistently influence ESG rating divergence. Our study provides valuable insights for regulators, investors, and researchers seeking to improve the reliability and comparability of ESG assessments and contributes to the development of more stable and transparent ESG evaluation framework.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Business & Management Studies
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56734/ijbms.v6n5a6
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Determinants Of Esg Ratings Disagreement – Evidence From China

Jingyu Tang
3 citations
International Journal of Business & Management Studies
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
6.62
article

The Determinants Of Esg Ratings Disagreement – Evidence From China

Jingyu Tang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study examines ESG rating disagreement among Chinese A-share listed firms using data from five major ESG rating agencies between 2010 and 2019. We construct three measures of rating divergence and analyze how firm characteristics influence these differences. Our findings reveal that the significance of explanatory variables varies depending on the definition of ESG disagreement and the combination of ratings used. While some variables, such as state ownership and profitability, show inconsistent effects, others, like firm size, leverage, and innovation activity, consistently influence ESG rating divergence. Our study provides valuable insights for regulators, investors, and researchers seeking to improve the reliability and comparability of ESG assessments and contributes to the development of more stable and transparent ESG evaluation framework.

International Journal of Business & Management StudiesVol. 06(05)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
6.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.