“Is This Ethical?” New Data on the Ethical Principles and Practices of Document Design

This study revisits Sam Dragga’s research on ethical decision-making in document design, updating it to reflect contemporary concerns. Our findings indicate that participants today perceive the document design scenarios as significantly more unethical than those in Dragga's original study, with heightened attention to accessibility, cultural sensitivity, and social justice. While Dragga's study emphasized concerns over the consequences of document design choices, our results suggest a shift in focus toward the writer's intent. Participants frequently judged deliberate manipulation as unethical, even in cases where no direct harm was evident. These findings highlight the evolving ethical priorities in technical communication and underscore the need for practitioners and educators to reassess and revise the field's guiding principles to align with contemporary values of inclusivity and social responsibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816251342582
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Is This Ethical?” New Data on the Ethical Principles and Practices of Document Design

Timothy Ponce, Amy Hodges, Leslie Seawright
1 links
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Law in Society and Culture
article

“Is This Ethical?” New Data on the Ethical Principles and Practices of Document Design

Timothy Ponce, Amy Hodges, Leslie Seawright
article en

Abstract

This study revisits Sam Dragga’s research on ethical decision-making in document design, updating it to reflect contemporary concerns. Our findings indicate that participants today perceive the document design scenarios as significantly more unethical than those in Dragga's original study, with heightened attention to accessibility, cultural sensitivity, and social justice. While Dragga's study emphasized concerns over the consequences of document design choices, our results suggest a shift in focus toward the writer's intent. Participants frequently judged deliberate manipulation as unethical, even in cases where no direct harm was evident. These findings highlight the evolving ethical priorities in technical communication and underscore the need for practitioners and educators to reassess and revise the field's guiding principles to align with contemporary values of inclusivity and social responsibility.

Journal of Technical Writing and CommunicationVol. 56(2)
Missouri State University (US), Texas State University (US), The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Is This Ethical?” New Data on the Ethical Principles and Practices of Document Design — Timothy Ponce, Amy Hodges, et al. · Journal of Technical Writing and Communication (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS