Exploring Marital Relationship Quality in Married Women: Communication Beliefs, Attachment Styles, and Initial Maladaptive Schemas

This study was conducted to predict the quality of marital relationships based on communication beliefs, attachment styles, and initial maladaptive schemas in married women. The statistical population of this study included all married women who sought counseling at family counseling centers and health clinics in our studied area. Using Green's formula ( 1991 ), a sample of 250 individuals was selected through convenience sampling. To collect data, questionnaires on marital quality by Busby, attachment styles by Hazan and Shaver, communication beliefs by Eidelson and Epstein, and initial maladaptive schemas by Young were used. Pearson correlation and simultaneous regression analysis were employed for data analysis. The results indicated that the quality of marital relationships can be predicted based on communication beliefs, attachment styles, and initial maladaptive schemas. Specifically, there was an indirect relationship between early maladaptive schemas, avoidant attachment style, anxious attachment style, and marital quality. Additionally, a direct relationship was observed between secure attachment style and marital quality. Improving marital relationship quality requires attention to attachment styles, communication beliefs, and maladaptive schemas, and family practitioners should pay special attention to these factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Family Journal
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807251343896
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Marital Relationship Quality in Married Women: Communication Beliefs, Attachment Styles, and Initial Maladaptive Schemas

Nima Firouzeh, Manouchehr Teymouri, Shahrzad Rezaee Rezvan, Mehdi Haresabadi et al.
The Family Journal
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

Exploring Marital Relationship Quality in Married Women: Communication Beliefs, Attachment Styles, and Initial Maladaptive Schemas

Nima Firouzeh, Manouchehr Teymouri, Shahrzad Rezaee Rezvan, Mehdi Haresabadi, Somaye Piri, Seyed Saeed Torabi, Hamidreza Shoraka, Mahtab Mosadeghian
article en

Abstract

This study was conducted to predict the quality of marital relationships based on communication beliefs, attachment styles, and initial maladaptive schemas in married women. The statistical population of this study included all married women who sought counseling at family counseling centers and health clinics in our studied area. Using Green's formula ( 1991 ), a sample of 250 individuals was selected through convenience sampling. To collect data, questionnaires on marital quality by Busby, attachment styles by Hazan and Shaver, communication beliefs by Eidelson and Epstein, and initial maladaptive schemas by Young were used. Pearson correlation and simultaneous regression analysis were employed for data analysis. The results indicated that the quality of marital relationships can be predicted based on communication beliefs, attachment styles, and initial maladaptive schemas. Specifically, there was an indirect relationship between early maladaptive schemas, avoidant attachment style, anxious attachment style, and marital quality. Additionally, a direct relationship was observed between secure attachment style and marital quality. Improving marital relationship quality requires attention to attachment styles, communication beliefs, and maladaptive schemas, and family practitioners should pay special attention to these factors.

The Family Journal
Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch (IR), Kharazmi University (IR), Islamic Azad University Semnan (IR), North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Esfarayen University of Technology (IR), Farhangian University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.