Compaction of a sandy loam soil not impacted by long-term biosolids applications

Soil compaction and soil organic matter (SOM) are critical factors influencing crop growth and soil health, yet their interaction and impact on plant-available water (PAW) remain underexplored. To address this, we investigated a 26-year field experiment on fine sandy loam soil in Washington State, USA, involving three biosolids application rates (0, 4.7, and 10.0 Mg ha⁻¹) applied every four years in a winter wheat-fallow rotation. Compacted and uncompacted strips were created using field-traffic, with additional intact soil cores from uncompacted strips compacted in the laboratory. Intact cores from uncompacted, field-compacted and lab-compacted treatments were analyzed for saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K sat ), soil moisture release curves, and bulk density (ρ b ). The change in ρ b after compaction (Δρ b ) and rebound (Δε) were assessed for lab-compacted cores. Disturbed soil samples were analyzed for Proctor maximum bulk density (ρ bmax ), critical water content (CWC), and contact angle (α). Biosolids application generally reduced ρ b and ρ bmax , increased CWC, volumetric water content at saturation (θ SAT ), K sat , and α but did not affect volumetric water content at field capacity (θ FC ), permanent wilting point (θ PWP ), or PAW. Compaction reduced θ SAT and K sat while increasing ρ b , θ FC , θ PWP , and PAW. While compaction impacted soil physical and hydraulic properties, biosolids had limited effects under the study conditions. Contrary to our expectations, no interaction between biosolids application and compaction treatments was observed. Despite numerous benefits of increased SOM with biosolids application, increased resistance to and recovery from soil compaction does not appear to be one of them in this study. • Long-term biosolids application did not affect plant available water (PAW). • Compaction-induced changes in bulk density were not affected by biosolids. • Induced soil compaction decreased θ SAT but increased PAW. • Biosolids application did not alter soil’s susceptibility to compaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil and Tillage Research
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2025.106648
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compaction of a sandy loam soil not impacted by long-term biosolids applications

Markus Flury, Gabriel LaHue, Haly Neely, Andy I. Bary et al.
1 citations
Soil and Tillage Research
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
0.95
article

Compaction of a sandy loam soil not impacted by long-term biosolids applications

Markus Flury, Gabriel LaHue, Haly Neely, Andy I. Bary, Idil Deniz Akin, Navdeep Singh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Soil compaction and soil organic matter (SOM) are critical factors influencing crop growth and soil health, yet their interaction and impact on plant-available water (PAW) remain underexplored. To address this, we investigated a 26-year field experiment on fine sandy loam soil in Washington State, USA, involving three biosolids application rates (0, 4.7, and 10.0 Mg ha⁻¹) applied every four years in a winter wheat-fallow rotation. Compacted and uncompacted strips were created using field-traffic, with additional intact soil cores from uncompacted strips compacted in the laboratory. Intact cores from uncompacted, field-compacted and lab-compacted treatments were analyzed for saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K sat ), soil moisture release curves, and bulk density (ρ b ). The change in ρ b after compaction (Δρ b ) and rebound (Δε) were assessed for lab-compacted cores. Disturbed soil samples were analyzed for Proctor maximum bulk density (ρ bmax ), critical water content (CWC), and contact angle (α). Biosolids application generally reduced ρ b and ρ bmax , increased CWC, volumetric water content at saturation (θ SAT ), K sat , and α but did not affect volumetric water content at field capacity (θ FC ), permanent wilting point (θ PWP ), or PAW. Compaction reduced θ SAT and K sat while increasing ρ b , θ FC , θ PWP , and PAW. While compaction impacted soil physical and hydraulic properties, biosolids had limited effects under the study conditions. Contrary to our expectations, no interaction between biosolids application and compaction treatments was observed. Despite numerous benefits of increased SOM with biosolids application, increased resistance to and recovery from soil compaction does not appear to be one of them in this study. • Long-term biosolids application did not affect plant available water (PAW). • Compaction-induced changes in bulk density were not affected by biosolids. • Induced soil compaction decreased θ SAT but increased PAW. • Biosolids application did not alter soil’s susceptibility to compaction.

Soil and Tillage ResearchVol. 253
University of California, Los Angeles (US), GC Systems (United States) (US), Washington State University (US), Western Kentucky University (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.