In situ Rb–Sr insights in the cooling history of the Petermann Orogeny, Central Australia

• In situ Rb–Sr ages and Ti-in-quartz thermometry constrain the thermal history of the Petermann Orogen. • Spatial variation in Rb–Sr cooling ages suggests differential exhumation during the Petermann Orogeny. • Heat production is proposed as an important controlling factor for cooling rates. The Ediacaran–Cambrian Petermann Orogen is a dextral transpressional orogen exposed in central Australia, which facilitated the exhumation of a high-pressure core and the deformation of the Neoproterozoic–Palaeozoic Amadeus Basin. Several studies have investigated the metamorphic and deformational evolution of the Petermann Orogen; however, the spatiotemporal variation of the deformation and cooling history is yet to be fully understood. In situ muscovite and biotite Rb–Sr geochronology, in combination with Ti-in-quartz thermometry is applied to map the spatiotemporal deformation and cooling patterns of the northern part of the Petermann Orogen. Interpreted muscovite Rb–Sr growth ages obtained from samples in the Petermann Nappe Complex (PNC), range between c. 598 Ma and 565 Ma, which correlate with the timing of deformation during the 600–520 Ma Petermann Orogeny. Interpreted muscovite and biotite cooling ages are younger in the east of the PNC (c. 556–541 Ma) and broadly correlate with the regional pattern of crustal heat production, suggesting that the geothermal gradient had a significant control on the timing and duration of cooling. Biotite Rb–Sr cooling ages between c. 555 Ma and 497 Ma for the orogenic core show no correlation with high heat production areas, however, differences in exhumed crustal levels across the Petermann Orogen are observed: high-P granulite facies rocks in the orogenic core vs middle-upper crustal rocks in the PNC, indicating that at least part of the spatiotemporal variation of cooling ages can be attributed to differential exhumation during the Petermann Orogeny. Hence, crustal heat production and differential exhumation were likely the main controlling factors on the duration and variation of cooling rates in the Petermann Orogen.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscience Frontiers
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102080
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In situ Rb–Sr insights in the cooling history of the Petermann Orogeny, Central Australia

Alexander T. De Vries Van Leeuwen, Martin Hand, Alejandra Bedoya, Stijn Glorie et al.
Geoscience Frontiers
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

In situ Rb–Sr insights in the cooling history of the Petermann Orogeny, Central Australia

Alexander T. De Vries Van Leeuwen, Martin Hand, Alejandra Bedoya, Stijn Glorie, Christopher L. Kirkland
article en

Abstract

• In situ Rb–Sr ages and Ti-in-quartz thermometry constrain the thermal history of the Petermann Orogen. • Spatial variation in Rb–Sr cooling ages suggests differential exhumation during the Petermann Orogeny. • Heat production is proposed as an important controlling factor for cooling rates. The Ediacaran–Cambrian Petermann Orogen is a dextral transpressional orogen exposed in central Australia, which facilitated the exhumation of a high-pressure core and the deformation of the Neoproterozoic–Palaeozoic Amadeus Basin. Several studies have investigated the metamorphic and deformational evolution of the Petermann Orogen; however, the spatiotemporal variation of the deformation and cooling history is yet to be fully understood. In situ muscovite and biotite Rb–Sr geochronology, in combination with Ti-in-quartz thermometry is applied to map the spatiotemporal deformation and cooling patterns of the northern part of the Petermann Orogen. Interpreted muscovite Rb–Sr growth ages obtained from samples in the Petermann Nappe Complex (PNC), range between c. 598 Ma and 565 Ma, which correlate with the timing of deformation during the 600–520 Ma Petermann Orogeny. Interpreted muscovite and biotite cooling ages are younger in the east of the PNC (c. 556–541 Ma) and broadly correlate with the regional pattern of crustal heat production, suggesting that the geothermal gradient had a significant control on the timing and duration of cooling. Biotite Rb–Sr cooling ages between c. 555 Ma and 497 Ma for the orogenic core show no correlation with high heat production areas, however, differences in exhumed crustal levels across the Petermann Orogen are observed: high-P granulite facies rocks in the orogenic core vs middle-upper crustal rocks in the PNC, indicating that at least part of the spatiotemporal variation of cooling ages can be attributed to differential exhumation during the Petermann Orogeny. Hence, crustal heat production and differential exhumation were likely the main controlling factors on the duration and variation of cooling rates in the Petermann Orogen.

Geoscience FrontiersVol. 16(4)
Curtin University (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.