Feeding niches drive different responses to plant defenses in two closely related species of classical biological control herbivores

• Congeneric biocontrol beetles avoid competition by niche partitioning on same host. • Leaf and reproductive parts feeders respond differently to plant chemical defenses. • Phytohormones modulate plant-insect interactions differently for each insect species. • Niche differences may allow multiple agents to effectively control invasive plants. Biological invasions threaten global ecosystems and economies, highlighting the need for sustainable management approaches like classical biological control (CBC), which involves releasing natural enemies from their native range. While releasing multiple natural enemies may enhance the CBC effectiveness, their interactions with host plant defenses remain poorly understood. This study explored the interactions between two congeneric specialist herbivores introduced to control Dioscorea bulbifera (air potato) in Florida, USA: Lilioceris cheni (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), primarily a leaf feeder, and L. egena, primarily a bulbil (aerial reproductive structures) feeder. We examined whether foliar herbivory by L. cheni or induced defenses by jasmonic acid (JA) or salicylic acid (SA) influenced L. egena’s feeding behavior and performance on bulbils. We conducted feeding assays to measure bulbil consumption and its relationship with pupal and adult mass as performance indicators. We used dose-dependent assays to test how varying concentrations of diosgenin, a key saponin defense compound in D. bulbifera , influenced the feeding and survival of both beetle species. Results indicated no significant differences in L. egena bulbil feeding across treatments; however, SA-treated plants produced significantly heavier pupae and adults than controls. Dose-response assays revealed non-linear, hump-shaped feeding and survival patterns in L. cheni , while L. egena ’s feeding and survival decreased with increasing saponin concentrations. These findings suggest that the beetles respond differently to plant defenses while occupying distinct feeding niches, likely allowing for additive impacts on D. bulbifera . This study contributes to understanding plant defenses in CBC and informs strategies to optimize biocontrol programs for managing invasive species.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Control
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2025.105794
Primary Topic
Biological Control of Invasive Species
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feeding niches drive different responses to plant defenses in two closely related species of classical biological control herbivores

Jasleen Kaur, Octavio Menocal, Emily Kraus, Philip G. Hahn et al.
Biological Control
Biological Control of Invasive Species
article

Feeding niches drive different responses to plant defenses in two closely related species of classical biological control herbivores

Jasleen Kaur, Octavio Menocal, Emily Kraus, Philip G. Hahn, Lucia Navia
article en

Abstract

• Congeneric biocontrol beetles avoid competition by niche partitioning on same host. • Leaf and reproductive parts feeders respond differently to plant chemical defenses. • Phytohormones modulate plant-insect interactions differently for each insect species. • Niche differences may allow multiple agents to effectively control invasive plants. Biological invasions threaten global ecosystems and economies, highlighting the need for sustainable management approaches like classical biological control (CBC), which involves releasing natural enemies from their native range. While releasing multiple natural enemies may enhance the CBC effectiveness, their interactions with host plant defenses remain poorly understood. This study explored the interactions between two congeneric specialist herbivores introduced to control Dioscorea bulbifera (air potato) in Florida, USA: Lilioceris cheni (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), primarily a leaf feeder, and L. egena, primarily a bulbil (aerial reproductive structures) feeder. We examined whether foliar herbivory by L. cheni or induced defenses by jasmonic acid (JA) or salicylic acid (SA) influenced L. egena’s feeding behavior and performance on bulbils. We conducted feeding assays to measure bulbil consumption and its relationship with pupal and adult mass as performance indicators. We used dose-dependent assays to test how varying concentrations of diosgenin, a key saponin defense compound in D. bulbifera , influenced the feeding and survival of both beetle species. Results indicated no significant differences in L. egena bulbil feeding across treatments; however, SA-treated plants produced significantly heavier pupae and adults than controls. Dose-response assays revealed non-linear, hump-shaped feeding and survival patterns in L. cheni , while L. egena ’s feeding and survival decreased with increasing saponin concentrations. These findings suggest that the beetles respond differently to plant defenses while occupying distinct feeding niches, likely allowing for additive impacts on D. bulbifera . This study contributes to understanding plant defenses in CBC and informs strategies to optimize biocontrol programs for managing invasive species.

Biological ControlVol. 206
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (US), University of Florida (US), California State University, Fresno (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Biological Control of Invasive Species
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.