Pandemic in Retrospect: Students’ Evaluation of Distance Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic

This study describes the distance learning experiences of university students in terms of their readiness, engagement, and performance amid the COVID-19 pandemic. It also examines the university’s and the administration’s support in attending to the academic and non-academic concerns of the students. Using a sequential explanatory design, the study utilized a quantitative online survey contextualized by qualitative methods such as key informant interviews and focus group discussions. The findings suggest the following: the students, in general, are equipped to manage distance education effectively, in terms of their gadgets, accessories, and internet connectivity; the remote learning mode engaged the students through the affordances brought by the learning platforms (VLE, MS Teams); and the students performed well in either major and general education subjects due in part to the support and performance of the teachers as well as the assistance of the university and the administration in laying down a framework for relevant teaching and learning. The students also demonstrated their preference for blended (50-50) classes, while it highlighted their concerns about mental health where it needed improvements. The study suggests that all forms of support are extended to optimize students’ learning while in quarantine. The study hopes that the findings will inform the crafting of university online learning policies in the following semesters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal on Culture History and Religion
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v6i2.3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pandemic in Retrospect: Students’ Evaluation of Distance Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Ross Mazo, Edwin Lineses, Regina L. Ruben, Maria Virginia G. Aguilar et al.
1 citations
International Journal on Culture History and Religion
Online and Blended Learning
2.10
article

Pandemic in Retrospect: Students’ Evaluation of Distance Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Ross Mazo, Edwin Lineses, Regina L. Ruben, Maria Virginia G. Aguilar, Loreto Camiloza
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study describes the distance learning experiences of university students in terms of their readiness, engagement, and performance amid the COVID-19 pandemic. It also examines the university’s and the administration’s support in attending to the academic and non-academic concerns of the students. Using a sequential explanatory design, the study utilized a quantitative online survey contextualized by qualitative methods such as key informant interviews and focus group discussions. The findings suggest the following: the students, in general, are equipped to manage distance education effectively, in terms of their gadgets, accessories, and internet connectivity; the remote learning mode engaged the students through the affordances brought by the learning platforms (VLE, MS Teams); and the students performed well in either major and general education subjects due in part to the support and performance of the teachers as well as the assistance of the university and the administration in laying down a framework for relevant teaching and learning. The students also demonstrated their preference for blended (50-50) classes, while it highlighted their concerns about mental health where it needed improvements. The study suggests that all forms of support are extended to optimize students’ learning while in quarantine. The study hopes that the findings will inform the crafting of university online learning policies in the following semesters.

International Journal on Culture History and ReligionVol. 6(2)
De La Salle University – Dasmariñas (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Online and Blended Learning
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.