Sound degradation type differentially affects neural indicators of cognitive workload and speech tracking

Hearing-in-noise (HIN) is a challenging task that is essential to human functioning in social, vocational, and educational contexts. Successful speech perception in noisy settings is thought to rely in part on the brain's ability to enhance neural representations of attended speech. In everyday HIN situations, important features of speech (i.e., pitch, rhythm) may be degraded in addition to being embedded in noise. The impact of these differences in sound quality on experiences of workload and neural representations of speech will be important for informing our knowledge on the cognitive demands imposed by every-day difficult listening situations. We investigated HIN perception in 20 healthy adults using continuous speech that was either clean, spectrally degraded, or temporally degraded. Each sound condition was presented both with and without pink noise. Participants engaged in a selective listening task, in which a short-story was presented with varying sound quality, while EEG data were recorded. Neural correlates of cognitive workload were obtained using power levels of two frequency bands sensitive to task difficulty manipulations: alpha (8 - 12 Hz) and theta (4 - 8 Hz). Acoustic and linguistic features (speech envelope, word onsets, word surprisal) were decoded to reveal the degree to which speech was successfully encoded. Overall, alpha-theta power increased significantly when noise was added across sound conditions, while prediction accuracy of speech tracking decreased, suggesting that more effort was required to listen, and that the speech was not as successfully encoded. The temporal degradation also resulted in greater EEG power, possibly as a function of a compensatory mechanism to restore the important temporal information required for speech comprehension. Our findings suggest that measures related to cognitive workload and successful speech encoding are differentially affected by noise and sound degradations, which may help to inform future interventions that aim to mitigate these every-day challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hearing Research
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2025.109303
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sound degradation type differentially affects neural indicators of cognitive workload and speech tracking

Emily B. J. Coffey, Keelin M. Greenlaw, Nathan Gagné
Hearing Research
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Sound degradation type differentially affects neural indicators of cognitive workload and speech tracking

Emily B. J. Coffey, Keelin M. Greenlaw, Nathan Gagné
article en

Abstract

Hearing-in-noise (HIN) is a challenging task that is essential to human functioning in social, vocational, and educational contexts. Successful speech perception in noisy settings is thought to rely in part on the brain's ability to enhance neural representations of attended speech. In everyday HIN situations, important features of speech (i.e., pitch, rhythm) may be degraded in addition to being embedded in noise. The impact of these differences in sound quality on experiences of workload and neural representations of speech will be important for informing our knowledge on the cognitive demands imposed by every-day difficult listening situations. We investigated HIN perception in 20 healthy adults using continuous speech that was either clean, spectrally degraded, or temporally degraded. Each sound condition was presented both with and without pink noise. Participants engaged in a selective listening task, in which a short-story was presented with varying sound quality, while EEG data were recorded. Neural correlates of cognitive workload were obtained using power levels of two frequency bands sensitive to task difficulty manipulations: alpha (8 - 12 Hz) and theta (4 - 8 Hz). Acoustic and linguistic features (speech envelope, word onsets, word surprisal) were decoded to reveal the degree to which speech was successfully encoded. Overall, alpha-theta power increased significantly when noise was added across sound conditions, while prediction accuracy of speech tracking decreased, suggesting that more effort was required to listen, and that the speech was not as successfully encoded. The temporal degradation also resulted in greater EEG power, possibly as a function of a compensatory mechanism to restore the important temporal information required for speech comprehension. Our findings suggest that measures related to cognitive workload and successful speech encoding are differentially affected by noise and sound degradations, which may help to inform future interventions that aim to mitigate these every-day challenges.

Hearing ResearchVol. 464
Centre for Research on Brain Language and Music (CA), International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research (CA), Concordia University (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.