Evaluation of Cesarean Delivery Risk by Physician Sex

This study aimed to examine the association between physician sex, cesarean delivery, and neonatal complications.We analyzed the Consortium on Safe Labor database including 228,437 deliveries from 2002 to 2008. The study focused on singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentations, excluding cases with contraindications to vaginal delivery, elective cesarean deliveries, and nonobstetricians and gynecologists or maternal-fetal medicine physician management. The primary outcome of this study was cesarean delivery; secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery due to arrest of dilation or descent, cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart tracings (NRFHT), cesarean delivery for other indications, and a composite of neonatal complications. To estimate average marginal effects (AMEs) in percentage points (pp) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of cesarean delivery between male and female physicians, we performed generalized estimating equations with Poisson distribution and exchange-correlation structure, adjusting for maternal, physician-level characteristics, and hospital-fixed effects.Of 108,004 individuals, 46,779 (43.3%) were attended by 183 female physicians, and 61,225 (56.7%) were attended by 250 male physicians. Female physicians were associated with a lower overall adjusted cesarean delivery proportion (11.93 vs. 13.47%; AME -1.54 pp [95% CI: -2.35, -0.73]), cesarean delivery for failure to progress (5.72 vs. 6.48%; AME -0.76 pp [95% CI: -1.24, -0.27]), and cesarean delivery for indications except for failure to progress or NRFHT (1.68 vs. 2.01%; AME -0.33 pp [95% CI: -0.56, -0.10]). There were no significant differences in cesarean outcomes for NRFHT or composite neonatal complications between male and female physicians.Compared with male physicians, female physicians had a lower rate of cesarean delivery. Further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and develop targeted interventions. · Compared with male physicians, female physicians had a lower rate of cesarean delivery.. · This reduction was particularly evident for cesarean deliveries due to failure to progress.. · The reduction was not associated with an increased risk of neonatal complications..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2615-5055
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Cesarean Delivery Risk by Physician Sex

George A. Saade, Tetsuya Kawakita, Lindsay S. Robbins, Misa Hayasaka et al.
American Journal of Perinatology
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Evaluation of Cesarean Delivery Risk by Physician Sex

George A. Saade, Tetsuya Kawakita, Lindsay S. Robbins, Misa Hayasaka, Yuki Joyama
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the association between physician sex, cesarean delivery, and neonatal complications.We analyzed the Consortium on Safe Labor database including 228,437 deliveries from 2002 to 2008. The study focused on singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentations, excluding cases with contraindications to vaginal delivery, elective cesarean deliveries, and nonobstetricians and gynecologists or maternal-fetal medicine physician management. The primary outcome of this study was cesarean delivery; secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery due to arrest of dilation or descent, cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart tracings (NRFHT), cesarean delivery for other indications, and a composite of neonatal complications. To estimate average marginal effects (AMEs) in percentage points (pp) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of cesarean delivery between male and female physicians, we performed generalized estimating equations with Poisson distribution and exchange-correlation structure, adjusting for maternal, physician-level characteristics, and hospital-fixed effects.Of 108,004 individuals, 46,779 (43.3%) were attended by 183 female physicians, and 61,225 (56.7%) were attended by 250 male physicians. Female physicians were associated with a lower overall adjusted cesarean delivery proportion (11.93 vs. 13.47%; AME -1.54 pp [95% CI: -2.35, -0.73]), cesarean delivery for failure to progress (5.72 vs. 6.48%; AME -0.76 pp [95% CI: -1.24, -0.27]), and cesarean delivery for indications except for failure to progress or NRFHT (1.68 vs. 2.01%; AME -0.33 pp [95% CI: -0.56, -0.10]). There were no significant differences in cesarean outcomes for NRFHT or composite neonatal complications between male and female physicians.Compared with male physicians, female physicians had a lower rate of cesarean delivery. Further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and develop targeted interventions. · Compared with male physicians, female physicians had a lower rate of cesarean delivery.. · This reduction was particularly evident for cesarean deliveries due to failure to progress.. · The reduction was not associated with an increased risk of neonatal complications..

American Journal of PerinatologyVol. 43(03)
Eastern Virginia Medical School (US), Columbia University (US), Old Dominion University (US)
Eastern Virginia Medical School
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.