Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer: Preoperatively Assessing Aggressiveness of Favorable and Unfavorable Intermediate-Risk Groups by Advanced Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Abstract The treatment decisions and prognostic outcomes have distinct differences between unfavorable intermediate-risk group (un-FIRG) prostate carcinoma (PCa) and favorable intermediate-risk group (FIRG) PCa. The study aimed to differentiate un-FIRG and FIRG by using advanced diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). From December 2018 to January 2023, 51 FIRG patients and 67 un-FIRG patients were enrolled in our study. All enrolled PCa patients underwent diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and stretched exponential model using a 3.0-T system. The statistical tests included independent samples t-test and binary logistic regression analysis. Results showed that fractional anisotropy (FA) value and mean kurtosis (MK) value of the un-FIRG (p < 0.001, p < 0.001) were significantly higher than those of the FIRG. On the contrary, mean diffusion (MD), standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), diffusion coefficient (D), and distribute diffusion coefficient (DDC) of the un-FIRG (p = 0.013, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001) were significantly lower than those of the FIRG. Results of binary logistic regression analysis showed that the diagnostic model was statistically significant, chi-square = 90.969, p < 0.001, which could effectively distinguish the 86.40% of un-FIRG in the intermediate-risk group. The results of receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve was 0.9429. Sensitivity and specificity were 88.06 and 84.31%. Compared with the FIRG group PCa, the un-FIRG group PCa exhibits lower standard ADC, D, DDC, and MD values, as well as higher FA and MK values. This suggests that preoperative advanced DWI may serve as an imaging biomarker for distinguishing between the FIRG group and un-FIRG group PCa. Combining preoperative advanced DWI (DKI, IVIM imaging, and the stretched exponential model) shows potential for noninvasive subrisk stratification of intermediate-risk group PCa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1809029
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer: Preoperatively Assessing Aggressiveness of Favorable and Unfavorable Intermediate-Risk Groups by Advanced Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Huabin Huang, Di-Min Liu, Jie Bian, Shuyi Li et al.
Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer: Preoperatively Assessing Aggressiveness of Favorable and Unfavorable Intermediate-Risk Groups by Advanced Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Huabin Huang, Di-Min Liu, Jie Bian, Shuyi Li, Kunpeng Zhou, Zhong-Xing Luo
article en

Abstract

Abstract The treatment decisions and prognostic outcomes have distinct differences between unfavorable intermediate-risk group (un-FIRG) prostate carcinoma (PCa) and favorable intermediate-risk group (FIRG) PCa. The study aimed to differentiate un-FIRG and FIRG by using advanced diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). From December 2018 to January 2023, 51 FIRG patients and 67 un-FIRG patients were enrolled in our study. All enrolled PCa patients underwent diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and stretched exponential model using a 3.0-T system. The statistical tests included independent samples t-test and binary logistic regression analysis. Results showed that fractional anisotropy (FA) value and mean kurtosis (MK) value of the un-FIRG (p < 0.001, p < 0.001) were significantly higher than those of the FIRG. On the contrary, mean diffusion (MD), standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), diffusion coefficient (D), and distribute diffusion coefficient (DDC) of the un-FIRG (p = 0.013, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001) were significantly lower than those of the FIRG. Results of binary logistic regression analysis showed that the diagnostic model was statistically significant, chi-square = 90.969, p < 0.001, which could effectively distinguish the 86.40% of un-FIRG in the intermediate-risk group. The results of receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve was 0.9429. Sensitivity and specificity were 88.06 and 84.31%. Compared with the FIRG group PCa, the un-FIRG group PCa exhibits lower standard ADC, D, DDC, and MD values, as well as higher FA and MK values. This suggests that preoperative advanced DWI may serve as an imaging biomarker for distinguishing between the FIRG group and un-FIRG group PCa. Combining preoperative advanced DWI (DKI, IVIM imaging, and the stretched exponential model) shows potential for noninvasive subrisk stratification of intermediate-risk group PCa.

Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal RadiologyVol. 08(03)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Dalian Medical University (CN), The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.