Numerical simulations of seismic centrifuge tests: Validation of pore water pressure models in sand

A realistic prediction of excess pore water pressure generation and the onset of liquefaction during earthquakes are crucial when performing effective seismic site response analysis. In the present research, the validation of two pore water pressure (PWP) models, namely energy-based GMP and strain-based VD models implemented in a one-dimensional site response analysis code, was conducted by comparing numerical predictions with high-quality seismic centrifuge test measurements. A careful discussion on the selection of input soil parameters for numerical simulations was made with particular emphasis on the PWP model parameter calibration which was based on undrained stress-controlled/strain-controlled cyclic simple shear (CSS) tests carried out on the same sand used in the centrifuge test. The results of the study reveal that the energy-based model predicts at all depths peak pore water pressures and dissipation behaviour in a satisfactory way with respect to experimental measurements, whereas the strain-based model underestimates the PWP measurements at low depths. Further comparisons of the acceleration response spectra illustrate that both the strain- and energy-based models provide higher computed spectral accelerations near the ground surface compared with the recorded ones, whereas the agreement is reasonable at middle depth. • Numerical analyses of seismic centrifuge tests on sand were performed by DEEPSOIL code. • Calibration of parameters of two PWP models implemented in the code was based on undrained CSS tests. • Energy-based model provides good agreement with the values measured in centrifuge. • Strain-based model underestimates PWP with respect to recordings at shallow depths. • Permeability k affects both R u,max and dissipation rate in numerical analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109459
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical simulations of seismic centrifuge tests: Validation of pore water pressure models in sand

V. Fioravante, Daniela Giretti, Giuseppe Tomasello, D. Porcino
2 citations
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
1.91
article

Numerical simulations of seismic centrifuge tests: Validation of pore water pressure models in sand

V. Fioravante, Daniela Giretti, Giuseppe Tomasello, D. Porcino
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A realistic prediction of excess pore water pressure generation and the onset of liquefaction during earthquakes are crucial when performing effective seismic site response analysis. In the present research, the validation of two pore water pressure (PWP) models, namely energy-based GMP and strain-based VD models implemented in a one-dimensional site response analysis code, was conducted by comparing numerical predictions with high-quality seismic centrifuge test measurements. A careful discussion on the selection of input soil parameters for numerical simulations was made with particular emphasis on the PWP model parameter calibration which was based on undrained stress-controlled/strain-controlled cyclic simple shear (CSS) tests carried out on the same sand used in the centrifuge test. The results of the study reveal that the energy-based model predicts at all depths peak pore water pressures and dissipation behaviour in a satisfactory way with respect to experimental measurements, whereas the strain-based model underestimates the PWP measurements at low depths. Further comparisons of the acceleration response spectra illustrate that both the strain- and energy-based models provide higher computed spectral accelerations near the ground surface compared with the recorded ones, whereas the agreement is reasonable at middle depth. • Numerical analyses of seismic centrifuge tests on sand were performed by DEEPSOIL code. • Calibration of parameters of two PWP models implemented in the code was based on undrained CSS tests. • Energy-based model provides good agreement with the values measured in centrifuge. • Strain-based model underestimates PWP with respect to recordings at shallow depths. • Permeability k affects both R u,max and dissipation rate in numerical analysis.

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake EngineeringVol. 197
University of Bergamo (IT), University of Ferrara (IT), University of Reggio Calabria (IT)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.