Comparison of Filtering Techniques for Water Level Estimation Using GEDI

Abstract. Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) satellite-based LiDAR altimeter data can used to determine water levels. However, GEDI LiDAR beams may contain errors due to factors such as atmospheric conditions and topographic features. Therefore, it is essential to filter out data that contains errors and does not meet the required conditions in water level estimation. In this study, two different filtering techniques have been used for estimation of water levels. The first technique utilizes auxiliary data such as quality flag, sensitivity, and solar elevation, which are provided together with the GEDI data. On the other hand, the second technique utilizes the Interquartile Range (IQR) method. The Burdur Lake, a Ramsar site located in the Southwest of the Turkey, was selected as a test area. Daytime data from 18 October 2019 and nighttime data from 14 January 2020 were downloaded for the Burdur Lake. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for the daytime data was calculated as 19.295 m. After filtering the data with auxiliary attributes, the RMSE value is decreased to 0.258 m. After applying the IQR filtering technique, the RMSE value was obtained as 0.317 m. For the nighttime data, the RMSE value was calculated as 0.292 m before filtering. The auxiliary data filtering was decreased the RMSE value into 0.118 meters. As a result of filtering with the IQR method, the RMSE value was obtained as 0.266 m. It was concluded that filtering is necessary to estimate water levels with GEDI data, especially for daytime data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-m-6-2025-221-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Filtering Techniques for Water Level Estimation Using GEDI

Ömer Gökberk Narin
1 citations
˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
article

Comparison of Filtering Techniques for Water Level Estimation Using GEDI

Ömer Gökberk Narin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) satellite-based LiDAR altimeter data can used to determine water levels. However, GEDI LiDAR beams may contain errors due to factors such as atmospheric conditions and topographic features. Therefore, it is essential to filter out data that contains errors and does not meet the required conditions in water level estimation. In this study, two different filtering techniques have been used for estimation of water levels. The first technique utilizes auxiliary data such as quality flag, sensitivity, and solar elevation, which are provided together with the GEDI data. On the other hand, the second technique utilizes the Interquartile Range (IQR) method. The Burdur Lake, a Ramsar site located in the Southwest of the Turkey, was selected as a test area. Daytime data from 18 October 2019 and nighttime data from 14 January 2020 were downloaded for the Burdur Lake. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for the daytime data was calculated as 19.295 m. After filtering the data with auxiliary attributes, the RMSE value is decreased to 0.258 m. After applying the IQR filtering technique, the RMSE value was obtained as 0.317 m. For the nighttime data, the RMSE value was calculated as 0.292 m before filtering. The auxiliary data filtering was decreased the RMSE value into 0.118 meters. As a result of filtering with the IQR method, the RMSE value was obtained as 0.266 m. It was concluded that filtering is necessary to estimate water levels with GEDI data, especially for daytime data.

˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciencesVol. XLVIII-M-6-2025
Afyon Kocatepe University (TR)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Filtering Techniques for Water Level Estimation Using GEDI — Ömer Gökberk Narin · ˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS