A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Feasibility and Acceptability of Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression after Stroke (HEADS: UP): An Online Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Stroke Survivors

Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess feasibility and acceptability of a stroke-specific mindfulness-based intervention called Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression after Stroke (HEADS: UP). Method This study was a mixed-methods pilot randomized controlled trial comparing HEADS: UP to treatment as usual (TAU). HEADS: UP is a 9-week mindfulness intervention for stroke survivors. UK (United Kingdon)-based stroke survivors were recruited and attended HEADS: UP Online. Psychological functioning outcomes measures and other data were collected online at pre-intervention (Week 0), post-intervention (Week 9), and follow-up (months 3 and 6). Participants were randomized 1:1 to either HEADS: UP or TAU. Results Sixty-two participants completed baseline questionnaires and were randomized to HEADS: UP ( n = 30) or TAU ( n = 32). Retention rates were as follows: HEADS: UP ( n = 25, 83.30%) versus TAU ( n = 25, 78.10%) at post-intervention, HEADS: UP ( n = 24, 80%) versus TAU ( n = 26, 81.30%) at 3-month follow-up, and HEADS: UP ( n = 20, 66.70%) versus TAU ( n = 25, 78.10%) at 6-month follow-up. The mean age for HEADS: UP was 56.0 years versus 56.80 for TAU. The HEADS: UP group was 30% male, while the TAU group was 56% male. Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS)-21 total mean score for HEADS: UP improved in the direction of expected effect (baseline 46.20, SD (standard deviation) = 24.00; post-intervention 24.00, SD = 16.10) indicating recovery versus no reliable change for TAU (baseline 36.10, SD = 18.70; post-intervention 31.60, SD = 20.40). HEADS: UP and TAU scores continued to improve over time. Between-group effect sizes (Cohen’s d ) at post-intervention were large for BAI (Beck Anxiety Inventory) ( d = 0.91), DASS-21 total ( d = 0.89), and BDI (Beck Depression Inventory)-II ( d = 0.86), highlighting the potential of HEADS: UP for improving depression and anxiety symptoms. At the six-month follow-up, the attrition rate was higher in the HEADS: UP group (33.30%) compared with TAU (21.90%). Conclusions HEADS: UP is feasible and acceptable and has potential to improve depression and anxiety symptoms for stroke survivors. Preregistration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04985838.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mindfulness
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-025-02595-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Feasibility and Acceptability of Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression after Stroke (HEADS: UP): An Online Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Stroke Survivors

Jo Booth, Xu Wang, Margaret Maxwell, Graeme Donald et al.
2 citations
Mindfulness
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
2.05
article

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Feasibility and Acceptability of Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression after Stroke (HEADS: UP): An Online Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Stroke Survivors

Jo Booth, Xu Wang, Margaret Maxwell, Graeme Donald, Bridget Davis, Nadine Dougall, Stewart W Mercer, Naomi Clark, Madeleine Grealy, Bhautesh Jani, Maggie Lawrence, Matilde Pieri, Eirini Kontou, Linda Fenocchi, Ben Parkinson, Helen Mason, Jennifer MacDonald, Michelle Jamieson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess feasibility and acceptability of a stroke-specific mindfulness-based intervention called Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression after Stroke (HEADS: UP). Method This study was a mixed-methods pilot randomized controlled trial comparing HEADS: UP to treatment as usual (TAU). HEADS: UP is a 9-week mindfulness intervention for stroke survivors. UK (United Kingdon)-based stroke survivors were recruited and attended HEADS: UP Online. Psychological functioning outcomes measures and other data were collected online at pre-intervention (Week 0), post-intervention (Week 9), and follow-up (months 3 and 6). Participants were randomized 1:1 to either HEADS: UP or TAU. Results Sixty-two participants completed baseline questionnaires and were randomized to HEADS: UP ( n = 30) or TAU ( n = 32). Retention rates were as follows: HEADS: UP ( n = 25, 83.30%) versus TAU ( n = 25, 78.10%) at post-intervention, HEADS: UP ( n = 24, 80%) versus TAU ( n = 26, 81.30%) at 3-month follow-up, and HEADS: UP ( n = 20, 66.70%) versus TAU ( n = 25, 78.10%) at 6-month follow-up. The mean age for HEADS: UP was 56.0 years versus 56.80 for TAU. The HEADS: UP group was 30% male, while the TAU group was 56% male. Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS)-21 total mean score for HEADS: UP improved in the direction of expected effect (baseline 46.20, SD (standard deviation) = 24.00; post-intervention 24.00, SD = 16.10) indicating recovery versus no reliable change for TAU (baseline 36.10, SD = 18.70; post-intervention 31.60, SD = 20.40). HEADS: UP and TAU scores continued to improve over time. Between-group effect sizes (Cohen’s d ) at post-intervention were large for BAI (Beck Anxiety Inventory) ( d = 0.91), DASS-21 total ( d = 0.89), and BDI (Beck Depression Inventory)-II ( d = 0.86), highlighting the potential of HEADS: UP for improving depression and anxiety symptoms. At the six-month follow-up, the attrition rate was higher in the HEADS: UP group (33.30%) compared with TAU (21.90%). Conclusions HEADS: UP is feasible and acceptable and has potential to improve depression and anxiety symptoms for stroke survivors. Preregistration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04985838.

MindfulnessVol. 16(7)
University of Stirling (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), University of Strathclyde (GB), Glasgow Caledonian University (GB), Edinburgh Napier University (GB), Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Institute of Mental Health (GB), Glasgow Centre for Population Health (GB), University of Salford (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), Leeds Beckett University (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Stroke Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.