Renesting Propensity of Reintroduced Eastern Migratory Whooping Cranes

Laying additional clutches of eggs, or renesting, can provide birds with more opportunities to breed each season, ultimately increasing reproductive potential. This is important for long-lived species like cranes, that produce relatively few offspring annually. The reintroduced Eastern Migratory Population (EMP) of endangered Whooping Cranes relies on releases of captive-reared juveniles for population growth. Using long-term nest monitoring data, we assessed the renesting propensity of 105 unique pairs of Whooping Cranes during 2005–2024 (n = 359). We used a two-tiered analysis of binomial generalized linear mixed-effects models to evaluate the effects of 15 individual covariates, related to parental age or experience, nest management geography, or chronology. Overall, 37.3% of pairs renested following failed first nesting attempts. We documented higher renesting rates from breeding females that were older or had more years of nesting experience (37.1% increase for each unit increase in female age), pairs outside of the regions in which captive-reared cranes were released (264.0% increase in “other” region compared to Necedah), or that had nests fail earlier in the season (10.1% decline for each day later in the season a first nest failed). Additionally, when eggs were collected from first nests as a part of nest management, pairs were more likely to renest (69.4% renested) than if their nest failed naturally (27.3% renested). Low rates of natural reproduction limit growth rates in the EMP, so understanding effects of management actions and limitations on breeding are important conservation tools which can be applied to other endangered species.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wild
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/wild2020019
Primary Topic
Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Renesting Propensity of Reintroduced Eastern Migratory Whooping Cranes

Nicole M. Gordon, Andrew J. Caven, Hillary L. Thompson
Wild
Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
article

Renesting Propensity of Reintroduced Eastern Migratory Whooping Cranes

Nicole M. Gordon, Andrew J. Caven, Hillary L. Thompson
article en

Abstract

Laying additional clutches of eggs, or renesting, can provide birds with more opportunities to breed each season, ultimately increasing reproductive potential. This is important for long-lived species like cranes, that produce relatively few offspring annually. The reintroduced Eastern Migratory Population (EMP) of endangered Whooping Cranes relies on releases of captive-reared juveniles for population growth. Using long-term nest monitoring data, we assessed the renesting propensity of 105 unique pairs of Whooping Cranes during 2005–2024 (n = 359). We used a two-tiered analysis of binomial generalized linear mixed-effects models to evaluate the effects of 15 individual covariates, related to parental age or experience, nest management geography, or chronology. Overall, 37.3% of pairs renested following failed first nesting attempts. We documented higher renesting rates from breeding females that were older or had more years of nesting experience (37.1% increase for each unit increase in female age), pairs outside of the regions in which captive-reared cranes were released (264.0% increase in “other” region compared to Necedah), or that had nests fail earlier in the season (10.1% decline for each day later in the season a first nest failed). Additionally, when eggs were collected from first nests as a part of nest management, pairs were more likely to renest (69.4% renested) than if their nest failed naturally (27.3% renested). Low rates of natural reproduction limit growth rates in the EMP, so understanding effects of management actions and limitations on breeding are important conservation tools which can be applied to other endangered species.

WildVol. 2(2)
International Crane Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Renesting Propensity of Reintroduced Eastern Migratory Whooping Cranes — Nicole M. Gordon, Andrew J. Caven, et al. · Wild (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS