Comparing L2 intelligibility for learners of French: Automatic speech recognition versus human listeners

Abstract In this study, I compare the accuracy of automatic speech recognition (ASR) transcription against two measures of intelligibility provided by human listeners. The data came from readings of five texts recorded by 15 language learners of French. Human understanding was gauged by (i) asking a group of 36 naïve first language (L1) speakers of French recruited from the general population to provide word‐for‐word transcriptions of the recordings, and (ii) asking two experienced French teachers (L1 speakers of French) to rate the recordings for intelligibility. The results reveal that ASR transcription accuracy was lower than that of human transcribers. However, all three measures, namely ASR transcription accuracy, human transcription accuracy, and human ratings of intelligibility, were correlated. Implications of these results for using the technology in foreign language teaching and learning are considered in the discussion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foreign Language Annals
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12807
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing L2 intelligibility for learners of French: Automatic speech recognition versus human listeners

Elena Shimanskaya
Foreign Language Annals
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Comparing L2 intelligibility for learners of French: Automatic speech recognition versus human listeners

Elena Shimanskaya
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this study, I compare the accuracy of automatic speech recognition (ASR) transcription against two measures of intelligibility provided by human listeners. The data came from readings of five texts recorded by 15 language learners of French. Human understanding was gauged by (i) asking a group of 36 naïve first language (L1) speakers of French recruited from the general population to provide word‐for‐word transcriptions of the recordings, and (ii) asking two experienced French teachers (L1 speakers of French) to rate the recordings for intelligibility. The results reveal that ASR transcription accuracy was lower than that of human transcribers. However, all three measures, namely ASR transcription accuracy, human transcription accuracy, and human ratings of intelligibility, were correlated. Implications of these results for using the technology in foreign language teaching and learning are considered in the discussion.

Foreign Language AnnalsVol. 58(2)
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
University of Nevada, Reno
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.