Informed consent and ethics committee involvement in case reports and case series: cross-sectional meta-research study
The findings reveal inconsistencies in ethics reporting, with 46% of articles mentioning ethics committee involvement and varying justifications for exemption. While 79% of articles reported informed consent, further improvements in transparency and standardization are needed. Clear guidelines on ethical approval requirements and consent documentation should be established to enhance the quality and ethical rigor of case reports.
Authors
- Livia Puljak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8467-6061)
- Marta Čivljak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6211-0174)
- Matea Valešić (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0352-7591)
Institutions
- Catholic University of Croatia (HR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Medical Ethics
- Published
- 2025-05-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01226-0
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Ethics in Clinical Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.64