A Comparative Study on Judicial Visualization in the U.S. and China

The visualization of judicial statistics is a new form of judicial openness in the era of big data, which is of great significance for the public to understand judicial dynamics and maintain judicial fairness. The study finds that neither the Supreme Court of China nor the U.S. Supreme Court provides a dashboard of judicial statistics, but the frequency of data updates in the United States is quarterly, and in China, it is updated in the form of annual reports. Among the court web portals of 35 provinces (including Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan) in China, only 3 courts provide visualization of judicial statistics. Among the 51 state court web portals in the United States, 18 courts conduct visualization of judicial statistics. For dg.o attendees, this research offers unique insights into how the two countries approach the challenge of making judicial data accessible and understandable to the public.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conference on Digital Government Research
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.929
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study on Judicial Visualization in the U.S. and China

Jin-Yun Zhou, Yi Long, Chuandai Miao
Conference on Digital Government Research
Law in Society and Culture
article

A Comparative Study on Judicial Visualization in the U.S. and China

Jin-Yun Zhou, Yi Long, Chuandai Miao
article en

Abstract

The visualization of judicial statistics is a new form of judicial openness in the era of big data, which is of great significance for the public to understand judicial dynamics and maintain judicial fairness. The study finds that neither the Supreme Court of China nor the U.S. Supreme Court provides a dashboard of judicial statistics, but the frequency of data updates in the United States is quarterly, and in China, it is updated in the form of annual reports. Among the court web portals of 35 provinces (including Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan) in China, only 3 courts provide visualization of judicial statistics. Among the 51 state court web portals in the United States, 18 courts conduct visualization of judicial statistics. For dg.o attendees, this research offers unique insights into how the two countries approach the challenge of making judicial data accessible and understandable to the public.

Conference on Digital Government ResearchVol. 1
Shanghai University of Political Science and Law (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study on Judicial Visualization in the U.S. and China — Jin-Yun Zhou, Yi Long, et al. · Conference on Digital Government Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS