Not all who wander are lost: an argument for searching to browse as a separate information behaviour

Introduction. The relationship between search and browse has long been framed as separate, interleaved and sometimes equal activities. With the shift to nearly exclusive online behaviour, this relationship is changing Method. In light of some surprising incidental research findings, we conduct a critical literature synthesis of literature on search typologies, exploratory search and browsing, especially digital browsing. Analysis. Based on the results of previous work, we identify a gap in previous models of search, specifically searching to browse. Results. The notion of searching to browse changes the relationship between searching and browsing, particularly in a digital context. This new form of both searching and browsing creates a need for new interfaces, particularly for collecting items of interest. Conclusions. We argue for searching to browse as a new form of information behaviour, one that is slowly being accommodated by digital information systems. We recommend that more digital information systems take searching to browse into account.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Research an international electronic journal
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30colis52351
Primary Topic
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not all who wander are lost: an argument for searching to browse as a separate information behaviour

George Buchanan, Michael B. Twidale, Dana McKay
Information Research an international electronic journal
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
article

Not all who wander are lost: an argument for searching to browse as a separate information behaviour

George Buchanan, Michael B. Twidale, Dana McKay
article en

Abstract

Introduction. The relationship between search and browse has long been framed as separate, interleaved and sometimes equal activities. With the shift to nearly exclusive online behaviour, this relationship is changing Method. In light of some surprising incidental research findings, we conduct a critical literature synthesis of literature on search typologies, exploratory search and browsing, especially digital browsing. Analysis. Based on the results of previous work, we identify a gap in previous models of search, specifically searching to browse. Results. The notion of searching to browse changes the relationship between searching and browsing, particularly in a digital context. This new form of both searching and browsing creates a need for new interfaces, particularly for collecting items of interest. Conclusions. We argue for searching to browse as a new form of information behaviour, one that is slowly being accommodated by digital information systems. We recommend that more digital information systems take searching to browse into account.

Information Research an international electronic journalVol. 30(CoLIS)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), MIT University (MK), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.