Exploring university students’ perspectives’ on ChatGPT integration in education

This study explores university students’ perceptions of ChatGPT, focusing on its educational benefits, drawbacks, and possible solutions. Data were collected through an online questionnaire completed by 350 students. A descriptive research design and Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR) were used to analyze responses. Findings show that 53.14% believe ChatGPT positively impacts academic performance, 47.14% find it useful for writing assignments, and 50% use it for exam preparation. However, students’ express concerns about its accuracy (61.72%), reliability (52.29%), privacy risks (52.57%), potential bias (47.33%), and misuse (43.71%). Broader concerns include security vulnerabilities (55.14%) and fears about AI replacing human labour (56.29%). Recommendations include integrating AI education into curricula to help students understand both capabilities and limitations of models like ChatGPT and emphasizing ethical considerations. Educator training should focus on evaluating information reliability, recognizing bias, and critically assessing AI-generated content. Educators should also prioritize human sources when appropriate. For policymakers, enforcing regulations that uphold accuracy, reliability, privacy, and ethical standards in AI is crucial. Developers are encouraged to improve model transparency and explainability to foster trust and accountability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Technology and Science Education
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.3007
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring university students’ perspectives’ on ChatGPT integration in education

Noah Mutai, Lawrence Ibeh, Priyadarshini Adyasha Pattanaik, Nguyễn Mạnh Cương et al.
3 citations
Journal of Technology and Science Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
article

Exploring university students’ perspectives’ on ChatGPT integration in education

Noah Mutai, Lawrence Ibeh, Priyadarshini Adyasha Pattanaik, Nguyễn Mạnh Cương, Navya Gubbi Sateeshchandra, Kaddour Chelabi, Olufunke Mercy Popoola, A. Makarov, Benjamin Bensam Sambiri
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study explores university students’ perceptions of ChatGPT, focusing on its educational benefits, drawbacks, and possible solutions. Data were collected through an online questionnaire completed by 350 students. A descriptive research design and Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR) were used to analyze responses. Findings show that 53.14% believe ChatGPT positively impacts academic performance, 47.14% find it useful for writing assignments, and 50% use it for exam preparation. However, students’ express concerns about its accuracy (61.72%), reliability (52.29%), privacy risks (52.57%), potential bias (47.33%), and misuse (43.71%). Broader concerns include security vulnerabilities (55.14%) and fears about AI replacing human labour (56.29%). Recommendations include integrating AI education into curricula to help students understand both capabilities and limitations of models like ChatGPT and emphasizing ethical considerations. Educator training should focus on evaluating information reliability, recognizing bias, and critically assessing AI-generated content. Educators should also prioritize human sources when appropriate. For policymakers, enforcing regulations that uphold accuracy, reliability, privacy, and ethical standards in AI is crucial. Developers are encouraged to improve model transparency and explainability to foster trust and accountability.

Journal of Technology and Science EducationVol. 15(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.