Women's tenure security on collective lands: A conceptual framework

Within discussions of land and resource rights, there is growing attention to women's rights, mostly in terms of household and individual rights to private property. This leaves unanswered questions about whether and how women's land rights can be secured under collective tenure, upon which billions of people worldwide depend. There is an important gap in conceptual tools, empirical understanding, and policy recommendations on this topic. To address this gap and lay the foundations for a sound body of empirical studies and appropriate policies, we develop a conceptual framework to improve understanding of women's land rights under collective tenure. We discuss what secure tenure for women on collective lands would entail, then what factors would affect women's tenure security. We give attention to particularities of rangelands, forests, and other types of collective lands as well as commonalities across types. A key theme that emerges is that for women to have secure tenure under collective tenure, the collective (group) itself must have tenure security and the women must have secure rights within this collective. The latter requires us to consider the governance structures, how men and women access and control land, and the extent to which women have voice and power within the collective. More consistent analyses of collective tenure systems using the conceptual framework presented in this paper can help to identify which action resources are important for groups to secure rights to collective lands, and for women to advocate for their rights within the group. • There is insufficient understanding of women's tenure security on collective lands. • Our framework helps identify factors affecting women's collective tenure security. • Women's collective tenure security depends on group and individual rights. • First, the group that holds the land must itself have tenure security. • Second, women should have secure rights in the group and in collective governance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103694
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Land Rights and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Women's tenure security on collective lands: A conceptual framework

Anne Larson, Rachael Knight, I. Monterroso, Ruth Meinzen‐Dick et al.
2 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Land Rights and Reforms
2.37
article

Women's tenure security on collective lands: A conceptual framework

Anne Larson, Rachael Knight, I. Monterroso, Ruth Meinzen‐Dick, Fiona Flintan, Cheryl R. Doss
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Within discussions of land and resource rights, there is growing attention to women's rights, mostly in terms of household and individual rights to private property. This leaves unanswered questions about whether and how women's land rights can be secured under collective tenure, upon which billions of people worldwide depend. There is an important gap in conceptual tools, empirical understanding, and policy recommendations on this topic. To address this gap and lay the foundations for a sound body of empirical studies and appropriate policies, we develop a conceptual framework to improve understanding of women's land rights under collective tenure. We discuss what secure tenure for women on collective lands would entail, then what factors would affect women's tenure security. We give attention to particularities of rangelands, forests, and other types of collective lands as well as commonalities across types. A key theme that emerges is that for women to have secure tenure under collective tenure, the collective (group) itself must have tenure security and the women must have secure rights within this collective. The latter requires us to consider the governance structures, how men and women access and control land, and the extent to which women have voice and power within the collective. More consistent analyses of collective tenure systems using the conceptual framework presented in this paper can help to identify which action resources are important for groups to secure rights to collective lands, and for women to advocate for their rights within the group. • There is insufficient understanding of women's tenure security on collective lands. • Our framework helps identify factors affecting women's collective tenure security. • Women's collective tenure security depends on group and individual rights. • First, the group that holds the land must itself have tenure security. • Second, women should have secure rights in the group and in collective governance.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 118
Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers, International Fund for Agricultural Development
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Land Rights and Reforms
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.