Aftermarket performance of emerging growth companies: The long‐term effects of the <scp>JOBS</scp> act and the role of institutional investors

Abstract We study the long‐run aftermarket performance of Emerging Growth Companies (EGCs), a new category of IPO issuers created by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act). We document that, in the long run, EGCs outperform by about 25 percentage points, compared to those firms that would have qualified as EGCs had they gone public after the enactment of the JOBS Act. We further find that institutional investors play an important role in supporting the long‐run performance of EGCs—not only do EGCs have greater institutional ownership, but the positive effect of institutional ownership on IPO firms' long‐run performance is also more pronounced. The paper represents a first attempt to study the long‐run aftermarket performance of EGCs and its determinants. Our findings contribute to the burgeoning literature on the effectiveness of the JOBS Act and evidence of the supporting role of institutional investors on IPO aftermarket performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Finance
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.70024
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aftermarket performance of emerging growth companies: The long‐term effects of the JOBS act and the role of institutional investors

Liang Guo, Xu Niu, Mengxi Chen
International Review of Finance
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Aftermarket performance of emerging growth companies: The long‐term effects of the JOBS act and the role of institutional investors

Liang Guo, Xu Niu, Mengxi Chen
article en

Abstract

Abstract We study the long‐run aftermarket performance of Emerging Growth Companies (EGCs), a new category of IPO issuers created by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act). We document that, in the long run, EGCs outperform by about 25 percentage points, compared to those firms that would have qualified as EGCs had they gone public after the enactment of the JOBS Act. We further find that institutional investors play an important role in supporting the long‐run performance of EGCs—not only do EGCs have greater institutional ownership, but the positive effect of institutional ownership on IPO firms' long‐run performance is also more pronounced. The paper represents a first attempt to study the long‐run aftermarket performance of EGCs and its determinants. Our findings contribute to the burgeoning literature on the effectiveness of the JOBS Act and evidence of the supporting role of institutional investors on IPO aftermarket performance.

International Review of FinanceVol. 25(2)
James Madison University (US), California State University, San Bernardino (US), The College of New Jersey (US)
Texas Tech University, Central Connecticut State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.