Theorising notions of searching, (re)sources and evaluation in the light of generative AI

Introduction. The introduction of publicly available large language models (LLMs) since 2022 has significantly challenged traditional library and information studies (LIS) core concepts. This paper argues that LIS needs to rethink aspects of its conceptual framework to address the challenges posed by the proliferation of AI-generated content and how this content is produced. Analysis. The study employs a theoretical analysis to critically examine the LIS concepts of search, sources and evaluation in the light of an increasingly AI-infused information infrastructure. Results. The main argument of the paper is that due to changes in the information infrastructure, sources are becoming increasingly invisible for people when they look for information. This has profound implications for how searching for and evaluation of information can be conceptualised. Conclusion. The paper is concluded by offering conceptual insights on how to theoretically navigate the rapidly evolving information landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Research an international electronic journal
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30colis52258
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Semantic Web and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theorising notions of searching, (re)sources and evaluation in the light of generative AI

Olof Sundin
4 citations
Information Research an international electronic journal
Semantic Web and Ontologies
9.92
article

Theorising notions of searching, (re)sources and evaluation in the light of generative AI

Olof Sundin
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Introduction. The introduction of publicly available large language models (LLMs) since 2022 has significantly challenged traditional library and information studies (LIS) core concepts. This paper argues that LIS needs to rethink aspects of its conceptual framework to address the challenges posed by the proliferation of AI-generated content and how this content is produced. Analysis. The study employs a theoretical analysis to critically examine the LIS concepts of search, sources and evaluation in the light of an increasingly AI-infused information infrastructure. Results. The main argument of the paper is that due to changes in the information infrastructure, sources are becoming increasingly invisible for people when they look for information. This has profound implications for how searching for and evaluation of information can be conceptualised. Conclusion. The paper is concluded by offering conceptual insights on how to theoretically navigate the rapidly evolving information landscape.

Information Research an international electronic journalVol. 30(CoLIS)
Lund University (SE)
Vetenskapsrådet
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Semantic Web and Ontologies
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.