Singing in the rain: the role of umbrella concepts in library and information science

Introduction. This paper considers the function and use of umbrella concepts within the library and information science (LIS) discipline. Method. This paper uses the example of information avoidance to examine how umbrella concepts shape LIS theoretical work, including how they impact the theorisation of an emerging discipline. Analysis. We use on Hirsch and Levin’s (1999) umbrella concept lifecycle to examine how umbrella concepts develop and, potentially, how they disappear. Results. We suggest that while umbrella concepts provide a useful way to unite disparate or emerging strands of research, they can also constrain the development of a field when the label becomes a convenience rather than an invitation to continue the theoretical work needed to progress scholarly constructs. Conclusions. We finish by considering how this examination of umbrella concepts plays into continued debates about the theoretical structure of LIS (or lack of it) as well as offering suggestions for future research priorities in this area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Research an international electronic journal
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30colis51916
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Literacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Singing in the rain: the role of umbrella concepts in library and information science

Alison Hicks, Jenny Bronstein, Ian Ruthven, Gunilla Widén et al.
Information Research an international electronic journal
Library Science and Information Literacy
article

Singing in the rain: the role of umbrella concepts in library and information science

Alison Hicks, Jenny Bronstein, Ian Ruthven, Gunilla Widén, Jette Seiden Hyldegård, Pamela J. McKenzie
article en

Abstract

Introduction. This paper considers the function and use of umbrella concepts within the library and information science (LIS) discipline. Method. This paper uses the example of information avoidance to examine how umbrella concepts shape LIS theoretical work, including how they impact the theorisation of an emerging discipline. Analysis. We use on Hirsch and Levin’s (1999) umbrella concept lifecycle to examine how umbrella concepts develop and, potentially, how they disappear. Results. We suggest that while umbrella concepts provide a useful way to unite disparate or emerging strands of research, they can also constrain the development of a field when the label becomes a convenience rather than an invitation to continue the theoretical work needed to progress scholarly constructs. Conclusions. We finish by considering how this examination of umbrella concepts plays into continued debates about the theoretical structure of LIS (or lack of it) as well as offering suggestions for future research priorities in this area.

Information Research an international electronic journalVol. 30(CoLIS)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Western University (CA), Åbo Akademi University (FI), Bar-Ilan University (IL), University of Strathclyde (GB), University College Copenhagen (DK), The London College (GB), University College London (GB), IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Library Science and Information Literacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.