Which Types of Public Services Matter? The Impact of Access to Public Services on the Urban Settlement Intention of Migrants in China

ABSTRACT This study examined which migrants accessed four types of urban public services including housing support, medical insurance, health records, and residence permits, and investigated the relative impacts of such accessibility of public services on the urban settlement intention of migrants. Using the China Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS) data in 2017, our results show that migrants have selective access to public services in urban China. That is, migrants with a higher socioeconomic status (in their prime working years, with higher household income and educational attainments) are more likely to access urban public services. Then we find that such multiple public services all have positive but different effects on migrants' settlement intention, after eliminating bias due to the selective accessibility of migrants by propensity score matching analysis. The magnitude of the estimated effects of housing support and medical insurance is considerably higher than residence permits and health records.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Population Space and Place
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.70038
Citations
3
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which Types of Public Services Matter? The Impact of Access to Public Services on the Urban Settlement Intention of Migrants in China

Z H Liu, Bintong Yu, Yuan Zheng, Zhigang Wang
3 citations
Population Space and Place
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
25.57
article

Which Types of Public Services Matter? The Impact of Access to Public Services on the Urban Settlement Intention of Migrants in China

Z H Liu, Bintong Yu, Yuan Zheng, Zhigang Wang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examined which migrants accessed four types of urban public services including housing support, medical insurance, health records, and residence permits, and investigated the relative impacts of such accessibility of public services on the urban settlement intention of migrants. Using the China Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS) data in 2017, our results show that migrants have selective access to public services in urban China. That is, migrants with a higher socioeconomic status (in their prime working years, with higher household income and educational attainments) are more likely to access urban public services. Then we find that such multiple public services all have positive but different effects on migrants' settlement intention, after eliminating bias due to the selective accessibility of migrants by propensity score matching analysis. The magnitude of the estimated effects of housing support and medical insurance is considerably higher than residence permits and health records.

Population Space and PlaceVol. 31(5)
Beijing Jiaotong University (CN), Renmin University of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Which Types of Public Services Matter? The Impact of Access to Public Services on the Urban Settlement Intention of Migrants in China — Z H Liu, Bintong Yu, et al. · Population Space and Place (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS