Managing for climate and production goals on crop-lands

The assumption that crop-land natural climate solutions (NCS) have benefits for both climate change mitigation and crop production remains largely untested. Here we model GHG emissions and crop yields from crop-land NCS through the end of the century. We find that favourable (win-win) outcomes were the exception not the norm; grass cover crops with no tillage lead to cumulative global GHG mitigation of 32.6 Pg CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent, 95% confidence interval (29.5, 35.7), by 2050 but reduce cumulative crop yields by 4.8 Pg, 95% confidence interval (4.0, 5.7). Legume cover crops with no tillage result in favourable outcomes through 2050 but increase GHG emissions for some regions by 2100. Crop-lands with low soil nitrogen and high clay are more likely to have favourable outcomes. Avoiding crop losses, we find modest GHG mitigation benefits from crop-land NCS, 4.4 Pg CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent, 95% confidence interval (4.2, 4.6) by 2050, indicating crop-land soil will constitute a fraction of food system decarbonization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Climate Change
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02337-7
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
33.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing for climate and production goals on crop-lands

Dominic Woolf, Jonathan Sanderman, Johannes Lehmann, Stephen A. Wood et al.
11 citations
Nature Climate Change
Climate change impacts on agriculture
33.30
article

Managing for climate and production goals on crop-lands

Dominic Woolf, Jonathan Sanderman, Johannes Lehmann, Stephen A. Wood, Shelby C. McClelland, Matthew Hayek, Stephen M. Ogle, Déborah Bossio, Yi Yang, Doria R. Gordon
article en
11 citations

Abstract

The assumption that crop-land natural climate solutions (NCS) have benefits for both climate change mitigation and crop production remains largely untested. Here we model GHG emissions and crop yields from crop-land NCS through the end of the century. We find that favourable (win-win) outcomes were the exception not the norm; grass cover crops with no tillage lead to cumulative global GHG mitigation of 32.6 Pg CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent, 95% confidence interval (29.5, 35.7), by 2050 but reduce cumulative crop yields by 4.8 Pg, 95% confidence interval (4.0, 5.7). Legume cover crops with no tillage result in favourable outcomes through 2050 but increase GHG emissions for some regions by 2100. Crop-lands with low soil nitrogen and high clay are more likely to have favourable outcomes. Avoiding crop losses, we find modest GHG mitigation benefits from crop-land NCS, 4.4 Pg CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent, 95% confidence interval (4.2, 4.6) by 2050, indicating crop-land soil will constitute a fraction of food system decarbonization.

Nature Climate ChangeVol. 15(6)
The Nature Conservancy (US), Environmental Defense Fund (US), Woodwell Climate Research Center (US), Cornell University (US), Yale University (US), University of Florida (US), Institute for Advanced Study (DE), New York University (US), Colorado State University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Arcadia Fund, Nature Conservancy, Environmental Defense Fund, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Office of Science, U.S. Forest Service, David R. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future , Cornell University, Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, Cornell University, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
33.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.