Chronic loneliness and isolation phenotypes, incident functional impairment and mortality in England between 2004 and 2018

Social deficits are potential risk factors for premature mortality. Most research has focused on social deficits measured at single points in time. It remains unclear if the chronicity of loneliness affects its impact on adverse health outcomes. This study assessed the effects of chronic loneliness and isolation in predicting incident functional impairment and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. This longitudinal study used panel data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, including 14 years of follow-up (waves 2-9, in 2004-2018). Social deficits over three waves (4 years) were measured using the UCLA loneliness scale and social isolation index, categorized as not present, fluctuating or chronic. We estimated the all-cause mortality risk with Cox proportional hazard modeling, and the Fine-Gray competing risk modeling was used to test the risk of functional impairment onset and cause-specific mortality. We analyzed 5,131 participants (mean age 67.6 years (s.d. 9.8)) in the mortality cohort (follow-up 9.8 years (IQR: 6.67-10.08)) and 4,279 participants (mean age 67.0 years (s.d. 9.6)) who were functional disability-free at baseline (follow-up 9.8 years (IQR: 7.17-10.17)). Compared with not being lonely/isolated, there was a higher risk of incident functional impairment among those with fluctuating loneliness (sub-hazard ratio (sHR) 1.30, 95% CI: 1.03-1.63) and chronic loneliness (sHR 1.58, 1.12-2.23), as well as chronic social isolation (sHR 1.41, 1.02-1.94). In survival analyses, compared with people who were not lonely/isolated, people experiencing fluctuating loneliness and social isolation had higher risks of all-cause mortality (loneliness HR 1.29, 1.13-1.48; isolation HR 1.15, 1.01-1.31). People with chronic isolation also had higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR 1.27, 1.05-1.55) and cancer-related mortality (sHR 1.69, 1.23-2.31). Over a 14 year follow-up, we found that chronic loneliness and isolation phenotypes were associated with aggravated risks of incident functional impairment and mortality. There was a potential dose-response relationship between chronicity of loneliness phenotypes and functional impairment onset and mortality. Preventing the onset of and transition to chronic loneliness and isolation in older age is a crucial target to support both the healthspan and the lifespan.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Mental Health
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-025-00436-0
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chronic loneliness and isolation phenotypes, incident functional impairment and mortality in England between 2004 and 2018

Andrew Steptoe, Qian Gao, Daisy E. Fancourt
5 citations
Nature Mental Health
Health disparities and outcomes
10.84
article

Chronic loneliness and isolation phenotypes, incident functional impairment and mortality in England between 2004 and 2018

Andrew Steptoe, Qian Gao, Daisy E. Fancourt
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Social deficits are potential risk factors for premature mortality. Most research has focused on social deficits measured at single points in time. It remains unclear if the chronicity of loneliness affects its impact on adverse health outcomes. This study assessed the effects of chronic loneliness and isolation in predicting incident functional impairment and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. This longitudinal study used panel data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, including 14 years of follow-up (waves 2-9, in 2004-2018). Social deficits over three waves (4 years) were measured using the UCLA loneliness scale and social isolation index, categorized as not present, fluctuating or chronic. We estimated the all-cause mortality risk with Cox proportional hazard modeling, and the Fine-Gray competing risk modeling was used to test the risk of functional impairment onset and cause-specific mortality. We analyzed 5,131 participants (mean age 67.6 years (s.d. 9.8)) in the mortality cohort (follow-up 9.8 years (IQR: 6.67-10.08)) and 4,279 participants (mean age 67.0 years (s.d. 9.6)) who were functional disability-free at baseline (follow-up 9.8 years (IQR: 7.17-10.17)). Compared with not being lonely/isolated, there was a higher risk of incident functional impairment among those with fluctuating loneliness (sub-hazard ratio (sHR) 1.30, 95% CI: 1.03-1.63) and chronic loneliness (sHR 1.58, 1.12-2.23), as well as chronic social isolation (sHR 1.41, 1.02-1.94). In survival analyses, compared with people who were not lonely/isolated, people experiencing fluctuating loneliness and social isolation had higher risks of all-cause mortality (loneliness HR 1.29, 1.13-1.48; isolation HR 1.15, 1.01-1.31). People with chronic isolation also had higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR 1.27, 1.05-1.55) and cancer-related mortality (sHR 1.69, 1.23-2.31). Over a 14 year follow-up, we found that chronic loneliness and isolation phenotypes were associated with aggravated risks of incident functional impairment and mortality. There was a potential dose-response relationship between chronicity of loneliness phenotypes and functional impairment onset and mortality. Preventing the onset of and transition to chronic loneliness and isolation in older age is a crucial target to support both the healthspan and the lifespan.

Nature Mental HealthVol. 3(6)
University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
National Endowment for the Arts, University of Florida, Government of the United Kingdom, National Institute for Health and Care Research, NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute on Aging
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Health disparities and outcomes
10.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.